The customer reported they were provided new leads by philips for demonstration purposes.When the customer removed the leads from the patient, there was a mark/burn on the skin.Calcium arginate was applied as treatment.No long-term effects were reported.One (b)(4) micro neolead radio lead was returned to (b)(6) for evaluation.The date code could not be confirmed.The lot code is located on the package which was discarded.Visual inspection of the leads found they were in good condition with no evident defects.Using a digital volt meter found the leads were not shorted together and working without any problems.The customer removed the leads from the patient, there reportedly was a mark/burn on the skin.Calcium arginate was applied as treatment.No long-term effects were reported.We are considering that, if the customer required a new lead wire, they purchased one.The returned material was scrapped after the evaluation was completed.Although the exact cause of the mark/burn could not be identified.There were no defects with the electrode as it functioned correctly.It possible the cause was a reaction to the adhesive on the electrode.
|