• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ) THERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH® SF BI-DIRECTIONAL NAV CATHETER; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ) THERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH® SF BI-DIRECTIONAL NAV CATHETER; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number D-1348-05-S
Device Problems Hole In Material (1293); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material (2944); Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/15/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a smart touch bidirectional sf catheter.Initially, it was reported that a 106 force sensor error displayed on the carto 3 system.The cable was replaced without resolution.The catheter was replaced and the issue resolved.The procedure was completed without patient consequence.This issue was assessed as not reportable as the warning functioned as intended.The potential risk that it could cause or contribute to a death or serious deterioration in state of health was remote.The biosense webster failure analysis lab noted on the first visual inspection (b)(6) 2017 that the clear pebax sleeve had metal exposed at 7 and 9 mm from the distal end of the tip dome with reddish brown material inside it.At this time, it was assessed that the returned catheter condition was a reportable malfunction as the exposure of the metal represents a break of catheter integrity that poses patient risk.However, after further review under the microscope, metal was not found exposed.Reddish brown material was found under the pebax.Therefore, the catheter was then sent for scanning electron microscope (sem).The sem results showed evidence of two holes, scratches, stress marks and mechanical damage on the surface of the pebax.Since there were holes on the pebax that could cause the foreign material to travel into the blood circulation, the pebax damage condition remains a reportable malfunction.The awareness date was reset to (b)(4) 2017.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's ref.No: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's ref.No: (b)(4).It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a smart touch bidirectional sf catheter.It was reported that a 106 force sensor error displayed on the carto 3 system.The cable was replaced without resolution.The catheter was replaced and the issue resolved.The procedure was completed without patient consequence.The returned device was visually inspected and it was found reddish brown material under the pebax with metal exposed.The catheter was evaluated for eeprom, and the functionality of the sensor catheter was tested on carto system.Eeprom data demonstrates the catheter was properly calibrated during manufacturing.The catheter was recognized by carto 3 system, however error 106 was displayed.The catheter was then dissected and it was determined that the root cause was an internal failure of the sensor.For the condition observed a scanning electron microscope (sem) testing was performed and the results showed evidence of two holes, scratches, stress marks and mechanical damage on the surface of the pebax.It is possible that damage was generated with an unknown object.No other anomalies were observed.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.During the manufacturing process, all the catheters are inspected for visual damages before packaging.On line inspections and functional tests are in place to prevent this type of damage from leaving the facility.The customer complaint has been verified.The root cause of the loss of electrical continuity at the sensor could not be determined.The root cause of the damage remains unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH® SF BI-DIRECTIONAL NAV CATHETER
Type of Device
CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte #1820
parque industrial salvacar
juarez, chihuahua 32599
MX  32599
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte #1820
parque industrial salvacar
juarez, chihuahua 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
joaquin kurz
33 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
9497893837
MDR Report Key6797328
MDR Text Key83741487
Report Number9673241-2017-00648
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
UDI-Device Identifier10846835010183
UDI-Public(01)10846835010183(11)170411(17)180331(10)17661103L
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/15/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/31/2018
Device Model NumberD-1348-05-S
Device Catalogue NumberD134805
Device Lot Number17661103L
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/21/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/15/2017
Initial Date FDA Received08/16/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/15/2017
06/15/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/30/2017
09/22/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/11/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-