A rothbarth uni-flo infusion catheter was used in an angiography catheter placement procedure on a (b)(6) old patient, which took approximately two hours.It was reported that, the nurse was preparing to inject medication for thrombolysis and found a crack on the connector (hub) of the catheter.The physician inserted a wire guide along the catheter and withdrew it.A new catheter was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
Additional information: kinks were noticed on the rothbarth uni-flo infusion catheter shaft upon device receipt.Corrected information: report source.Investigation - evaluation: a review of the complaint history, dimensional verification, device history record, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), trends, quality control, and visual inspection of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.One rothbarth uni-flo infusion catheter was returned for investigation.Two kinks were noted in the catheter shaft near the proximal end.A compression was noted at 16.8 centimeters (cm), and 17.7 cm from the proximal end.No marker bands were present.The distal tip is angled with an open lumen.The hub is cracked 6.0 millimeters (mm) in length starting from the proximal end of the hub running parallel to the catheter.A document-based investigation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the finished product was not made to specifications.Review of the device history record of the finished product shows one nonconforming event that could contribute to this failure mode.The affected parts were scrapped prior to proceeding with the work order.A complaint history search revealed that there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, a definite root cause could not be determined; however, shipping/handling of the device and/or excessive torque on the hub could have contributed to the device failure.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.Monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.
|