• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER GMBH LOCKING SCREW ANCHORAGE Ø3.0MM / L18MM; PLATE, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER GMBH LOCKING SCREW ANCHORAGE Ø3.0MM / L18MM; PLATE, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PLSL3018S
Device Problems Break (1069); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 01/12/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the lisfranc plate has broken after implantation.The device was implanted on (b)(6) 2016.The patient was non weight bearing for 6 weeks after being implanted.In late (b)(6) 2016 patient complained of pain over top of left foot keeping her awake at night.Steroid injection given to help relieve pain on that visit.On (b)(6) 2017 patient said that the pain was no better and steroid injection did not help.X rays requested and 1 broken screw was visible and noted.Patient will have the screw and plate removed on (b)(6) and during procedure 2nd broken screw was discovered.All screws and plates removed in procedure.(b)(6) consultant podiatric surgeon stated that the compression hole in the plate was not used in the original procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event that locking screw anchorage ¿3.0mm / l18mm was alleged of 'implant breakage after surgery' could be confirmed.Based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to be device unrelated.The failure was caused by fatigue.The microscopic inspection revealed that the fracture surface had suffered severe secondary damage.Evidence of microscopic vibration fracture characteristics was found on the fracture surface.Even if bone fusion occurred and was confirmed before patient was originally discharged, it has been reported that patient was only 2 weeks non-weight bearing and 4-6 weeks in air cast boot.This early mobilization had most likely fragilized the screw structure and initiated the fatigue solicitations.Please note that the instruction for use v15096 anchorage sterile ((b)(4))) reads: ''precautions for use the product does not allow the immediate resumption of activity by the patient and is not designed to support an immediate load.Immobilization is necessary during the osteosynthesis.It is necessary to inform the patient of the precautions to be taken to ensure the success of the implantation.[original statement].The anchorage plate system is an internal fixation system which shall fix bone segments in a correct position until sufficient bone consolidation is achieved.The anchorage plating system is not intended to transmit full forces and bending moments of daily routine.Loading and weightbearing have to be individually reduced.Influence factors for the required load reduction are: the type and the localization of fixation, the bone quality (e.G.Strong bone in younger patients vs.Osteoporotic bone), correct fixation technique (e.G.Correct dimension of the plate, correct positioning of the plate, sufficient length of the plate and the screws, p g p, g p, sufficient bending of the plate, correct screw placement with sufficient insertion torque).In addition, a steroid injection was performed next to the implanted screw, when the instruction for use ((b)(4) anchorage sterile ((b)(4))) reads: ''never perform intramuscular injection next to the implant.[original statement].Therefore this case is closed as user/patient related.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If any further information is provided, the investigation report will be updated.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the lisfranc plate has broken after implantation.The device was implanted on (b)(6) 2016.The patient was non weight bearing for 6 weeks after being implanted.In late (b)(6) 2016 patient complained of pain over top of left foot keeping her awake at night.Steroid injection given to help relieve pain on that visit.(b)(6) 2017 patient said that the pain was no better and steroid injection did not help.X rays requested and 1 broken screw was visible and noted.Patient will have the screw and plate removed on (b)(6) and during procedure 2nd broken screw was discovered.All screws and plates removed in procedure.(b)(6) -consultant podiatric surgeon stated that the compression hole in the plate was not used in the original procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LOCKING SCREW ANCHORAGE Ø3.0MM / L18MM
Type of Device
PLATE, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER GMBH
bohnackerweg 1
postfach
selzach 2545
CH  2545
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER GMBH
bohnackerweg 1
postfach
selzach 2545
CH   2545
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key6818902
MDR Text Key83605088
Report Number0008031020-2017-00494
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGB
PMA/PMN Number
K083447
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician Assistant
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/31/2021
Device Catalogue NumberPLSL3018S
Device Lot NumberV01683
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/23/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/27/2017
Initial Date FDA Received08/24/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/21/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/17/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/17/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-