• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. HANDPIECE MICS; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. HANDPIECE MICS; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 209063
Device Problems Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198); Mechanical Problem (1384)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/22/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
Mako mics hand piece started making loud noise and shuddering during reaming phase of mako tha.Loud noise and shuddering noted mid way through reaming.Reaming completed using manual reamer and hip completed with minimal delay.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: it was reported that the handpiece did not work.Issue was noticed during case, therefor there was less then 15 minutes case delay and no patient harm.Device history review: review of device history records indicate (b)(4) devices were manufactured under lot k07gk and (b)(4) including (b)(4) were accepted into final stock on 6/14/16.Complaint history review: a review of complaints related to parts in lot number k07gk, p/n 209063 shows no other complaint(s) related to the failure in this investigation.Material inspection: material analysis was not completed because the error was functional.Visual inspection: visual inspection revealed no physical damage of unit.Dimensional inspection: dimensional inspection was not completed.Reported problem was a functional issue.Functional inspection: the handpiece was tested in the handpiece test (qip0243) and failed.The motor did not spin during the test.Screenshot is attached.Conclusions: the handpiece driver electronics (commutation board) communicate with the handpiece trigger.A failure of this communication will break the process that allows the trigger command to result in the motor spinning.Corrective action/preventive action: a review of stryker¿s nc/capa database indicated that (b)(4) and capa (b)(4) are associated with the failure mode reported in this event.
 
Event Description
Mako mics hand piece started making loud noise and shuddering during reaming phase of mako tha.Loud noise and shuddering noted mid way through reaming.Reaming completed using manual reamer and hip completed with minimal delay.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HANDPIECE MICS
Type of Device
STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer Contact
bethany hinson
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale, FL 33317
9546280700
MDR Report Key6824800
MDR Text Key83891710
Report Number3005985723-2017-00399
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAU
PMA/PMN Number
K170593
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/04/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number209063
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/22/2017
Initial Date FDA Received08/28/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/11/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/04/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age67 YR
Patient Weight107
-
-