• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION PRECISION; SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION PRECISION; SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number SC-2218-50
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problems Inadequate Pain Relief (2388); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/22/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: model #: sc-2218-50 serial #: (b)(4) description: linear st lead, 50cm model #: sc-1110-02 serial #: (b)(4) description: precision implantable pulse generator (ipg) model #: sc-4316 lot #: 15683288 description: next generation anchor kit-sterile.
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient's leads was showing high impedances.It was noted that the patient had a lead migration and was having non targeted stimulation.No device malfunction was suspected with the explanted products just the leads.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein the leads were replaced.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The returned ipg (sc-1110-02/(b)(4)) and clik anchor (sc-4316/(b)(4)) were analyzed and no anomalies were found.Sc-2218-50 (sn:(b)(4)) device evaluation indicated that the complaint was confirmed.Two cables were fractured at the kinked site where the clik was positioned.Fracture location is 1 cm from the clik anchor set screw mark.The cable fractures resulted in high impedances and loss of stimulation.No cables were exposed at the site.Sc-2218-50(sn:(b)(4)) device evaluation indicated that the complaint was confirmed.The lead body was cleanly cut into pieces.X-ray inspection found no cable fractures.Damage to the device was similar to the typical explant damage and was not considered a failure.
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient's leads was showing high impedances.It was noted that the patient had a lead migration and was having non targeted stimulation.No device malfunction was suspected with the explanted products just the leads.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein the leads were replaced.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received that the patient was experiencing inadequate stimulation.Discharge diagnoses showed mechanical breakdown and dislodgement of the device.
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient's leads was showing high impedances.It was noted that the patient had a lead migration and was having non targeted stimulation.No device malfunction was suspected with the explanted products just the leads.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein the leads were replaced.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRECISION
Type of Device
SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer Contact
talar tahmasian
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
6619494863
MDR Report Key6850044
MDR Text Key85274065
Report Number3006630150-2017-03407
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier08714729767725
UDI-Public08714729767725
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
030017
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/22/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/01/2015
Device Model NumberSC-2218-50
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/28/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/22/2017
Initial Date FDA Received09/07/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/12/2017
09/13/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/28/2017
10/11/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/31/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age40 YR
-
-