An evaluation of the returned axial connector found wear patterns on both the set screw and body which are consistent with an implant that has experienced high impact loads.Similar wear patterns have been replicated in bench top testing by imparting high impact forces on the rod within a set screw-rod-pedicle screw construct.The high impact forces push the rod through the interface and results in the deep gouging on the distal surface of the set screw.The position of the connector while implanted, was at a location as an interbody device.When an interbody device is implanted, there will be less anatomical support of the construct at that level due to soft tissue resection.This means there will be less load sharing between the construct and the anatomy at this location.As such, the forces on the construct are larger at that level.One side of the construct had a rod spanning the level with the interbody, while the other side utilized the axial connector as shown in the x-rays.The axial forces on the construct would be transferred to the rod-connector interface.When the patient bent over, high forces were placed on the rod connector construct causing the rod to slip axially.
|