The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of juaxf589 showed one other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.Both complaints for this lot number (juaxf589) have been reported from the same (b)(6) facility.
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a detachment of the base of a statlock from the foam pad is confirmed, and the cause is determined to be manufacturing-related.The device returned was picc plus statlock device with movable posts.For the purposes of directional references in this investigation, the statlock frame of reference is with the lettering up and arrows pointing away from the viewer.The other (sample 2) still had its adhesive backing and had its base attached only partially, such that the right side was more bound than the left.The device was marked to show where the adherence of the base to the pad began, and the base was then peeled off.On the adherent side of the pad, material was found to be missing, having come away with the base, and on the other, no material was missing, although a clear impression of the base was present.A sample picc plus device was used for comparison.The base was pulled off the pad, which required significant force, and the separated surfaces examined.The outline of the base on the pad was easily visible and marked by missing foam material.One chunk in particular came away on the bottom of the base.It is evident that the statlock device returned did not have a standard coverage of adhesive binding the base to the foam.This resulted in susceptibility to detachment.The device was sent to the manufacturing site for further evaluation.Mfg conclusion: the complaint for retainer weakly attached and detaching from the foam pad has been confirmed per evaluation.The root cause for the reported event is related to manufacturing due to no and poor application of adhesive.A lot history review (lhr) of juaxf589 showed one other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.Both complaints for this lot number (juaxf589) have been reported from the same (b)(6) facility.
|