• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; SPINAL VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; SPINAL VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT DEVICE Back to Search Results
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Choi, j; et al (2017) single-stage transpedicular vertebrectomy and expandable cage placement for treatment of unstable mid and lower lumbar burst fractures.This report is for an unknown synex cage (unknown quantity/unknown lot).The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no device was returned and no lot number or part number was provided.(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after subsequent review of the following literature article: choi, j; et al (2017) single-stage transpedicular vertebrectomy and expandable cage placement for treatment of unstable mid and lower lumbar burst fractures.Clin spine surg; 30:2, e257-e263.This is a retrospective study to examine the single-stage transpedicular vertebrectomy and expandable cage placement for treatment of unstable mid and lower lumbar burst fractures (below the l3).From 2009 and august 2011, eleven patients (5 women, 6 men) underwent surgical intervention using an expandable titanium cage (synex; synthes, (b)(4)) under circumstances that indicated mechanical instability, progressively worsening neurological status, and/or back pain unresponsive to nonsurgical treatment.There was 1 intraoperative complication; patient 11 experienced inadvertent dural tear while expanding the cage, which was managed with simple repairing.There was 1 late postoperative complication; patient 9 developed cage subsidence at the upper end 2 months postoperatively.A copy of the article will be submitted with the medwatch.This report is 1 of 2 for (b)(4).This report is for an unknown synex cage and refers to the serious injury of patient 9, (b)(6) male who experienced subsidence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: original report stated, patient 9, (b)(6) male who experienced subsidence as a serious injury; revising report is captured as a serious injury/ reportable malfunction.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is for an unknown synex cage and refers to the serious injury/reportable malfunction of patient 9, (b)(6) male who experienced subsidence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device used for treatment, not for diagnosis.(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
SPINAL VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key6878833
MDR Text Key86748795
Report Number2520274-2017-12297
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MQP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/06/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/06/2017
Initial Date FDA Received09/20/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/20/2017
09/25/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/21/2017
09/25/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
-
-