• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Unable to Obtain Readings (1516)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/19/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Section d information references the main component of the system and other applicable components are: product id: 3889-28, lot# va10ptq, implanted: (b)(6) 2016, explanted: (b)(6) 2017, product type: lead.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received by a manufacturer representative (rep) from a healthcare provider (hcp) regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).The hcp reported that the patient was having a lead revision due to lead migration.After the lead was replaced the original ins was connected, but impedance checks on the case showed "???" while other combinations were normal.Impedances were checked again at 2.0 and 300 pulse width, then at 3.0 and 300 pulse width, then 4.0 and 300 pulse width, and finally 5.0 and 300 pulse width whoever the issue was not resolved.The hcp connected a new ins and ran impedance tests again and all were normal.The issue was resolved at the time of this report and it was noted that the cause of the lead migration was not known as the patient did not fall or have any trauma to their body.There were no further complication reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of the implantable neurostimulator (ins) model 3058 serial (b)(4) showed no significant anomalies and passed final functional testing.Due to the nature of the complaint, an impedance test was performed with a known good placed in 0.9% saline solution and normal impedances were measured using various parameters.Good, stable output was observed on all electrode pairs when received.The telemetry was determined to be acceptable.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device received, analysis not yet complete.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
No new information reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6879171
MDR Text Key86747640
Report Number3004209178-2017-19701
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/16/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/14/2017
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/26/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/19/2017
Initial Date FDA Received09/20/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/20/2017
11/06/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/27/2017
11/16/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/23/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
-
-