A valiant stent graft system was selected for in a patient for the endovascular treatment of a 5.5 cm thoracic aortic aneurysm.It was reported that when the delivery system was inserted into the patient¿s body, strong resistance was noted.The delivery system was thus removed and flushing was attempted; however, flushing was unsuccessful.The physician decided to discontinue using it.The device was replaced with another manufacturer¿s product and the treatment was completed without further issues.The physician stated that the cause of the event could not be determined.No additional clinical sequelae were reported and the patient is fine.
|
Additional information received reported that the device was flushed prior to use, but it was reported that it was hard to flush.After the device was removed and flushing attempted for a second time, the guidewire lumen could not be irrigated, and no fluid could be pushed through the system.Film evaluation summary: the cause of the device positioning difficulties and flushing issues could not be determined from the single pre-implant ct/3d-recon image and sizing information provided.Complete pre-implant ct¿s and films during implant were not available for return, and the device was discarded.The single image provided showed the thoracic aorta which was scattered with calcification, but was not tortuous or otherwise noteworthy.Between the lsa and celiac arteries the thoracic diameter ranged from 32.6mm max to 30mm minimum.The sizing report noted that the diameter at the origin of the right and left common iliac arteries (d6r <(><<)>(><(>&<)><(><<)>)> d6l) were 15mm and 12mm respectively, and the diameter of the access vessel diameter (d7r <(><<)>(><(>&<)><(> <<)>)> d7l) measured 7.4mm and 7.6mm respectively; which is small for the 24fr thoracic device.The morphology of the access and iliac vessels was not reported and were not visible on this single returned image.It is possible that patient anatomy at the access site (possible tortuous, calcified, and small diameter access vessels) may have contributed to the event.It is also possible that this was related to the device; however, the device was discarded and no analysis could not be performed.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|