• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: REVISION OPTICS, INC. RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

REVISION OPTICS, INC. RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY Back to Search Results
Model Number 600-0032
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Corneal Clouding/Hazing (1878)
Event Date 08/28/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Corneal haze is listed in the device labeling as a known potential risk.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The subject was enrolled in a foreign clinical trial and underwent implantation of the corneal inlay in the left eye on (b)(6) 2016.The study allows concurrent lasik and includes the use of low-dose mitomycin c on the exposed stromal bed immediately prior to inlay implantation.The subject presented with central corneal haze in the operative eye 14 months postoperatively.The inlay was explanted on (b)(6) 2017 to address grade 0.5 central corneal haze.Preoperatively, the patient's best corrected distance visual acuity (bcdva) was 20/20, but bcdva was not measured at onset of corneal haze or prior to explant.The surgeon believes that extended debris in the femtosecond laser corneal flap was a contributing factor.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The explanted inlay was returned to the manufacturer and subjected to visual microscopic inspection and dimensional analysis.The edge thickness and diameter were measured and found to be within specifications.Cuts and particles were observed on the device, but these findings are consistent with findings for corneal inlays that have been explanted since surgical instruments are required to remove the device from the eye and place it in a hydrated storage container for transport.The device history record (dhr) review of the manufacturing lot for this device was performed and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings related to the reported issue.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Rvo received the following updated information.At last examination on (b)(6) 2017, the corneal haze has resolved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint reference #: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The patient had concurrent lasik performed in the operative eye at the time of inlay implantation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY
Type of Device
CORNEAL INLAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
REVISION OPTICS, INC.
25651 atlantic ocean drive
suite a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer (Section G)
REVISION OPTICS, INC.
25651 atlantic ocean drive
suite a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer Contact
pushpita singh
25651 atlantic ocean drive
suite a1
lake forest, CA 92630-8835
9497072740
MDR Report Key6898011
MDR Text Key87525482
Report Number3005956347-2017-00111
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMX
PMA/PMN Number
P150034
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other,stu
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date07/08/2017
Device Model Number600-0032
Device Lot Number002627
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/26/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/28/2017
Initial Date FDA Received09/27/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/27/2017
11/08/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/24/2017
12/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/08/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
MITOMYCIN-C, FEMTOSECOND LASER FOR FLAP CREATION
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age51 YR
-
-