I was implanted with two peek corpectomy cages into the cervical spine (procode mqp).Post-op imaging studies show that one of the two cages dislocated and migrated into the spinal canal.Device-labeling states that use in the cervical spine is an absolute contraindication, yet the review of the device construct shows that the device is designed to fit into the cervical spine.The two part numbers involved are 6240841 and 6240861.Also part number 6240841 expired in 2010, but was implanted in 2011.I will require revision surgery.The implanting surgeon did not disclose the contraindicated use and device-related risk associated with device use in the cervical spine, nor did he disclose he is being paid by the device sponsor.
|