• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MITG-OKLAHOMA CITY TRUCLEAR¿ ULTRA MINI TISSUE REMOVAL DEVICE; HYSTEROSCOPE (AND ACCESSORIES)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MITG-OKLAHOMA CITY TRUCLEAR¿ ULTRA MINI TISSUE REMOVAL DEVICE; HYSTEROSCOPE (AND ACCESSORIES) Back to Search Results
Model Number 72204064
Device Problems Break (1069); Mechanics Altered (2984)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/07/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
According to the reporter, during polypectomy, the device began to take a few bites out of the fibroid before no longer making any further progress during resection of submucosal myoma.After multiple attempts from different angles, the blade would either get stuck, slowly close cutting window.The surgeon pulled the blade out of the cavity and pressed the pedal and came to the same result, the window cut quickly for a moment, and then began to close extremely slowly.Another ultra mini blade was used to complete the case.They consulted with other team members after surgery and the consensus was that either the device may have gotten torqued too much or just locked up randomly.There was no patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary one device was received for evaluation.This device had been used in the treatment or diagnosis of a patient.A review of the lot number reported indicates that the product was within the assigned expiration date at the time of the reported incident.The returned product did not meet specification as received.Visual inspection found the sluff chamber had score marks.The reported condition was confirmed.The investigation found the blade was not damaged.The blade did not move freely when activated in the forward/reverse mode.The sluff chamber was out of specification.The investigation identified the root cause of the reported event to be an assembly error.The provided lot number indicates that this product is an oem.Corrective action has been initiated.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Post market vigilance (pmv) received one truclear ultra mini tissue removal device opened by the account with the appropriate packaging in a undamaged condition.The product will expire on 2018¿02-03.The visual inspection of the returned product noted no visual abnormalities.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, as per the additional information received, the event occurred on (b)(6)2017.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRUCLEAR¿ ULTRA MINI TISSUE REMOVAL DEVICE
Type of Device
HYSTEROSCOPE (AND ACCESSORIES)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MITG-OKLAHOMA CITY
75 s. meridianave
oklahoma OK 73107
Manufacturer (Section G)
MITG-OKLAHOMA CITY
75 s. meridianave
oklahoma OK 73107
Manufacturer Contact
lisa hernandez
60 middletown ave
north haven, CT 06473
2034925563
MDR Report Key6914865
MDR Text Key88220748
Report Number1643264-2017-21112
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HIH
UDI-Device Identifier10884521744097
UDI-Public10884521744097
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/02/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/03/2018
Device Model Number72204064
Device Catalogue Number72204064
Device Lot NumberG22283
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/06/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/07/2017
Initial Date FDA Received10/05/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/18/2017
04/04/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/16/2017
05/02/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-