|
Catalog Number 466P306AU |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Cellulitis (1768); Embolism (1829); Occlusion (1984); Pain (1994); Thrombosis (2100)
|
Event Date 09/15/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As reported, the patient underwent placement of trapease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages to the patient, including, but not limited to, caval thrombosis, dvt, post-thrombotic syndrome, thrombosis/embolism, severe pain, and cellulitis.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, and pain and suffering, and other damages.The product was not returned for analysis.Additionally, as the sterile lot number was not available, device history record review could not be performed.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Post procedural thrombosis, embolism, and dvt¿s are not related to a device malfunction.An occlusion within the vena cava or lower extremities may impede perfusion and cause venous insufficiency leading to possible swelling, cellulitis and pain of the lower extremities.Clinical factors that may have influenced the events described include patient, pharmacological, lesion characteristics or other comorbidities.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported event is related to the design, manufacturing process or implantation of the device; therefore no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported by the legal brief, the patient underwent placement of trapease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages to the patient, including, but not limited to, caval thrombosis, dvt, post-thrombotic syndrome, thrombosis/embolism, severe pain, and cellulitis.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, and pain and suffering, and other damages.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that a patient underwent placement of trapease vena cava filter.The information received indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages to the patient, including, but not limited to, anxiety, caval thrombosis, occlusion of the inferior vena cava (ivc) deep vein thrombosis (dvt), post-thrombotic syndrome, thrombosis/embolism, severe pain, and cellulitis.The indication for the device implant was frequent dvt¿s.The device was implanted via the right internal jugular vein below the level of the renal veins.There is currently no additional information available.The product was not returned for analysis.A review of the device history record revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported complaint.The trapease is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Recurring deep vein thrombosis, blood clots, clotting, and device occlusion related to clotting do not indicate a device malfunction.Rather, patient and pharmacological factors may have contributed to these events.Without the procedural films and post-implant imaging available for review, the reported events and or a device malfunction could be confirmed, nor is it possible to establish a relationship between the reported events and the device.Post-thrombotic syndrome (pts) is a problem that can develop in nearly half of all patients who experience a deep vein thrombosis (blood clot) in the leg.Pts symptoms include chronic leg pain, swelling, redness, and ulcers (sores).As the patient¿s medical history has not been provided, it is not possible to determine a relationship between the events and the device.Cellulitis, pain, anxiety, and post-thrombotic syndrome do not represent a device malfunction and may be related to underlying patient specific issues.Given the limited information currently available for review, there is nothing to suggest that a malfunction in the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|