• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO II ANNULOPLASTY RING; RING, ANNULOPLASTY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO II ANNULOPLASTY RING; RING, ANNULOPLASTY Back to Search Results
Model Number 5200
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Mitral Valve Stenosis (1965)
Event Date 09/14/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device evaluation: the product was returned for evaluation.Customer report of mitral stenosis could not be confirmed through visual observations.Report of pannus growth was not confirmed.X-ray demonstrated ring intact.Cuts were observed on the cloth and silicone around the ring.Sutures remained attached.Post-operatively, the body undergoes various phases of the tissue response continuum resulting in the fibrous encapsulation of the ring.Local and systemic factors of the patient may play a role in the wound healing and inflammatory responses to biomaterials and implants.Based on the information received, a definitive root cause cannot be determined.No further corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events through the use of edwards quality systems.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Edwards received information that this 28 mm mitral annuloplasty ring, implanted approximately three (3) years and two (2) months, was explanted due to mitral stenosis secondary to pannus growth.This device was originally implanted for mitral valvuloplasty to correct mitral regurgitation.This device was explanted and replaced with a 27 mm valve with no adverse patient effects reported as a result of the valve replacement.The condition of the valve at explant was reported as ¿pannus growth on this ring was observed and it led to mitral stenosis¿.The patient status was reported as ¿recovered¿ at icu.The device was returned for evaluation.There was no allegation of device malfunction.Multiple cardiac surgical procedure: aortic valve replacement with a 25 mm valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO II ANNULOPLASTY RING
Type of Device
RING, ANNULOPLASTY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
neil landry
1 edwards way
lfs-33
irvine, CA 92614
9492502289
MDR Report Key6922956
MDR Text Key88934078
Report Number2015691-2017-03263
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K083470
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/14/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number5200
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/21/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/14/2017
Initial Date FDA Received10/06/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/16/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/26/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/12/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
-
-