• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK EXPRESSEW II FLEXIBLE SUTURE PASSER; ARTHROSCOPIC SUTURE/NEEDLE PASSER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK EXPRESSEW II FLEXIBLE SUTURE PASSER; ARTHROSCOPIC SUTURE/NEEDLE PASSER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 214004
Device Problem Device Damaged by Another Device (2915)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/12/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.No udi# exists for the specified product code.See associated medwatch: 1221934-2017-10566.
 
Event Description
The affiliate reported via email during use of the expressew gun, the e111 needle 214141 snapped and a portion of needle has become stuck in distal end of the expressew 11 gun 214040.Broken fragment removed and discarded.Replacement gun and needle used without incident.No ae to patient.No delay to procedure.Additional information received via email from the affiliate on 9-21-2017: do you know how many passes were made prior to the break? unknown.When did the breakage occur? unknown.Were there any procedural or patient anatomy factors which may have contributed to the breakage? no.All available information have been provided.None further is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint device was received and visually inspected.Visual observations revealed no anomalies on the expressew gun.The laser markings are slightly faded but readable.It was noticed that a broken needle tip found jammed at distal tip of expressew gun.The needle body was not present inside the gun.This complaint can be confirmed.As this is a reusable device, it is possible that tissue debris was lodged inside the shaft at the distal end and without proper cleaning/ sterilization; the device would become rough to operate over time and the needle might have got jammed.Other than this possibility, we cannot discern a root cause for this failure.A dhr review has been conducted and the results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.No udi # exists for the specified product code.See associated medwatch: 1221934-2017-10566.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EXPRESSEW II FLEXIBLE SUTURE PASSER
Type of Device
ARTHROSCOPIC SUTURE/NEEDLE PASSER
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer lawrence
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5089776860
MDR Report Key6934793
MDR Text Key90047750
Report Number1221934-2017-10567
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LXH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/12/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number214004
Device Lot NumberK4249KS-101118
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/30/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer09/12/2017
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/12/2017
Initial Date FDA Received10/10/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/30/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/20/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/22/2010
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-