• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL MICRUSFRAME COIL; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL MICRUSFRAME COIL; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number MFR100305
Device Problems Difficult To Position (1467); Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/25/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Mfg name: codman & shurtleff, inc.Dba depuy synthes products, inc.Information regarding patient age, gender, weight and medical history is not available.Udi: lot number unknown; (b)(4).Conclusion: the micrusframe coil was not returned for analysis.In addition, the lot number was not available; therefore, a dhr could not be performed.The positioning difficulty with coil herniation into the parent vessel could not be confirmed without product return for analysis.The root cause of the event could not be determined; however, the excelsior microcatheter may have contributed to the event.There is no current safety signal identified related to the reported events based on review of complaint histories for the devices.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This is an initial/final mdr.
 
Event Description
As reported by a healthcare professional, two galaxy g3 coils (gly120308/s11506 and glx120306/s12256) and 1 mircusframe s coil (mfr100305/lot unk) were not able to be advanced completely into the aneurysm before pushing the excelsior sl-10 45 microcatheter back into the parent vessel.Four non-codman coils were then advanced completely without any difficulty.There was no death or serious injury and no additional medical intervention was required.The patient condition was good.There was medium vessel tortuosity.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information received 10/20/2017: there was no resistance during advancement of the coils through the microcatheter and a continuous flush had been maintained through the microcatheter.There had been no difficulty in getting the coils to confirm to the walls of the small posterior communicating artery aneurysm and the events did not result in disruption/reduction in cerebral blood flow.There was no difficulty in removing the coils through the microcatheter.The events resulted in a 20 minute procedure delay, and there was no patient injury.The new information does not change the baseline conclusion of the event previously reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MICRUSFRAME COIL
Type of Device
NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
rue girardet 29
le locle jura
SZ 
Manufacturer Contact
joaquin kurz
47709 freemont blvd
freemont, CA 94538
9497899383
MDR Report Key6964122
MDR Text Key90534431
Report Number3013875781-2017-00008
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K150319
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberMFR100305
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/20/2017
Initial Date FDA Received10/20/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/20/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/20/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-