• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number P-50 PL
Device Problem No Flow (2991)
Patient Problem Intraocular Pressure Increased (1937)
Event Date 08/24/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: a customer reported that there was no drainage and the shunt was explanted.The device history record (dhr) for the batch was reviewed.No abnormalities were found during the dhr review and the product was released according to release criteria.No sample received when completing the preliminary summary, therefore, the condition of the sample could not be verified.All products pass 100% final inspection prior to approval.If a defect would be noticed, the product would have been rejected and segregated immediately.The root cause cannot be determined as no sample received.The root cause will be reassessed.There have been no other complaints reported in the lot number.Additional information has been requested and received.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
A healthcare professional reported a glaucoma filtering device that would not drain 3 days following a device implant procedure.On the 7th day the device was removed.Additional information was provided by the physician, who reported that in the first 2-4 days there was a suspicion of no filtration through the shunt.After 5 days with underlying moderate increased intraocular pressure it was decided to revise the surgery area; during that surgery there was absence of filtration through the general shunt's canal.The shunt was removed and a traditional trabeculectomy was preformed at that time.The event has not resolved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: the product was returned for investigation: the lumen was found to be open.Therefore, the complaint cannot be confirmed.The root cause is inconclusive - no problem found since during inner illumination the lumen was found to be open.The blockage could have been caused by many different reasons during and after the clinical procedure.The reported blockage does not seem to be product related.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE
Type of Device
IMPLANT, EYE VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS  90850
Manufacturer (Section G)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS   90850
Manufacturer Contact
nadia bailey
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8176152230
MDR Report Key6964893
MDR Text Key89827423
Report Number3003701944-2017-00160
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KYF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeRS
PMA/PMN Number
K012852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/01/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberP-50 PL
Device Catalogue Number24053
Device Lot NumberASKU
Other Device ID Number00380650704962
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/15/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/21/2017
Initial Date FDA Received10/20/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/23/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/01/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
25 G NEEDLE; 8.0 SILK SUTURE; DEXAMETHASONE; DICLOFENAC; INFINITI CAUTERY; VIGAMOX
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age79 YR
-
-