Model Number 606-0001 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Corneal Clouding/Hazing (1878); Visual Disturbances (2140); Halo (2227)
|
Event Date 09/22/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The site is being contacted to clarify whether the device is available for evaluation.The device history records were reviewed and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings that relate to the reported issue.Corneal haze, halos, and double vision are listed in the device labeling as known potential risks.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
The subject was enrolled in a foreign clinical trial and underwent uneventful implantation of the investigational raindrop corneal inlay in the right eye on (b)(6) 2017.The inlay was explanted 5 weeks postoperatively to address faint central corneal haze.The patient also reported experiencing moderate halos and marked double vision.The surgeon believes that extended debris in the flap interface contributed to the development of haze.The haze did not result in a clinically significant decrease in best corrected distance visual acuity (bcdva).The patient is scheduled for examination 1-month and 3-months post inlay removal.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The explanted device was returned to the manufacturer; however, thorough microscopic inspection revealed there was no inlay inside the container and no further analysis could be performed.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient follow-up was requested from the study personnel, who provided the following additional information.At last examination on (b)(6) 2017, the visual disturbances (halos/double vision) had resolved and bcdva returned to baseline (20/16) with persistent trace central corneal haze.Additional information has been requested.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|