• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA RADIFOCUS GLIDECATH HYDROPHILIC COATED CATH.; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA RADIFOCUS GLIDECATH HYDROPHILIC COATED CATH.; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Model Number CG508
Device Problem Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 10/02/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The actual device was not returned to the manufacturer facility for evaluation.No evaluation could be conducted due to the device not being returned.With no device return the exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the available information.There is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.The production lot number was not provided by the user facility, which prevented a meaningful review of the device history record, shipping inspection record and complaint files.(b)(4).All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
 
Event Description
The user facility reported that the 20 x 39 mmm cx was passed through a 5fr 100 glidecath during a type 2 endoleak that was being treated through transcaval access.The coil was being fed through the catheter and resistance was felt.Most of the coil was out of the catheter until they could no longer push the coil or retract it.The physicians tried to push the coil out with multiple wires and were unsuccessful.The catheter was then removed and a snare was used to pull the coil out - which part of the coil appeared to have made it out of the aortic sac into the vena cava.The patient was fine and already had a coil deployed into the endoleak.It was reported that the patient was stable.The procedure outcome was reported to be successful.Additional information was received on 10/4/2017.The glidecath appeared to have backed up and looped a little bit which may have been strain from the sheath but there was no confirmed kink.No subsequent coils were delivered as the entire system had to be removed.The coil appeared frayed and when it was pulled out by snare it was visibly damaged.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RADIFOCUS GLIDECATH HYDROPHILIC COATED CATH.
Type of Device
CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, shizuoka 418
JA  418
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
reg. no. 9681834
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, shizuoka 418
JA   418
Manufacturer Contact
terry callahan
reg. no. 2243441
2101 cottontail ln.
somerset, NJ 08873
8002837866
MDR Report Key6979351
MDR Text Key90324111
Report Number9681834-2017-00233
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
UDI-Device Identifier04987350772473
UDI-Public04987350772473
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K915414
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/26/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberCG508
Device Catalogue NumberRF*XL95110A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/02/2017
Initial Date FDA Received10/26/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
AZUR COILS
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age84 YR
Patient Weight85
-
-