• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION NEU_ENTERRA_INS; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION NEU_ENTERRA_INS; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number NEU_ENTERRA_INS
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Post Operative Wound Infection (2446)
Event Date 07/19/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Other applicable component: product id: neu_enterra_ins, lot# unknown, product type: implantable neurostimulator.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Arthur, l.E., slattery, l., richardson, w.Tailored approach to gastroparesis significantly improves symptoms.Surg endosc.2017.Doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5775-7 summary: gastroparesis is difficult to treat and many patients do not report relief of symptoms with medical therapy alone.Several operative approaches have been described.This study shows the results of our selective surgical approach for patients with gastroparesis.Materials and methods this is a retrospective study of prospective data from our electronic medical record and data symptom sheet.All patients had a pre-operative gastric emptying study showing gastroparesis, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and either a ct or an upper gi series with small bowel follow-through.All patients had pre- and post-operative symptom sheets where seven symptoms were scored for severity and frequency on a scale of 0¿4.The scores were analyzed by a professional statistician using paired sample t test.Results 58 patients met inclusion criteria.Thirty three had gastric stimulator (ges), 7 pyloroplasty (pp), 16 with both gastric stimulator and pyloroplasty (gsp), and 2 sleeve gastrectomy.For patients in the gsp group, the second procedure was performed if there was inadequate improvement with the first procedure.There was no mortality.The follow-up period was 6¿316 weeks (mean 66.107, sd 69.42).Ges significantly improved frequency and severity for all symptoms except frequency of bloating and postprandial fullness.Pp significantly improved nausea and vomiting severity, frequency of nausea, and early satiety.Symptom improvement for gsp was measured from after the first to after the second procedure.Gsp significantly improved all but vomiting severity and frequency of early satiety, postprandial fullness, and epigastric pain.Conclusion all procedures significantly improved symptoms, although numbers are small in the pp group.Ges demonstrates more improvement than pp, and if pp or ges does not adequately improve symptoms gsp is appropriate.In our practice, gastrectomy was reserved as a last resort.Reported events: for the gastric stimulator only group one patient experienced pain at the stimulator site and had to have their stimulator removed a year after original placement.For the group who underwent gastric stimulator placement as their second operation, a patient experienced a superficial wound infection.No specific device information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NEU_ENTERRA_INS
Type of Device
INTESTINAL STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6985178
MDR Text Key90582731
Report Number3007566237-2017-04596
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
H990014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/27/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNEU_ENTERRA_INS
Device Catalogue NumberNEU_ENTERRA_INS
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/02/2017
Initial Date FDA Received10/27/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-