The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.The hospital disposed of the device.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the superior mesenteric artery (sma) using indigo system aspiration catheters 6 (cat6s).During the procedure, after completing a pass using a cat6 with a non-penumbra sheath, the physician wanted to remove the cat6 to clean sheath rotating hemostasis valve (rhv) which was clogged; however, the rhv was too tight.Therefore, the physician used a hemostat to loosen the rhv.The physician then used another rhv at the hub of the sheath to minimize blood loss while cleaning sheath rhv.It was reported that the physician used the rhv on the hub of the cat6 but clamped the shaft of the sheath instead of the hub.Consequently, the sheath became ovalized.While attempting to re-insert the cat6 into the sheath using the sheath rhv, the physician met resistance at the damaged portion of the sheath which impacted the shape of the cat6.Therefore, the physician removed the cat6, and used the sheath inner dilator to run through the sheath and reshape it.The procedure was then completed using a new cat6 and the same sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|