• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THERAKOS, INC CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THERAKOS, INC CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number NOT APPLICABLE
Device Problems Break (1069); Leak/Splash (1354); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 10/04/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The system was used for treatment.This case is reportable as a mdr due to the reportable malfunctions of the drive tube leak/break and centrifuge bowl leak/break.Since these reportable malfunctions are only associated with the kit, this mdr will only be against the kit.A batch record review of kit lot f126 was conducted.There were no non-conformances associated with this lot.This lot met all release requirements.A review of kit lot f126 for the reported complaint issue shows no trends.Trends were reviewed for complaint categories, centrifuge bowl leak/break, alarm #7: blood leak (centrifuge chamber), drive tube leak/break, and noise.No trends were detected for these complaint categories.A photo analysis was conducted for this complaint.A review of the photos confirmed the leak, as the photos indicated that there was a leak within the centrifuge chamber.The evaluation of the photos determined that the centrifuge bowl had broken and that the centrifuge bowl's cover was still locked into the instrument's platen.The photos also showed that the drive tube had broken in half and that the centrifuge leak detector strip was damaged.The alarm # 7: blood leak (centrifuge chamber) alarm, damaged centrifuge leak detector strip, and the drive tube leak/break are all most likely a result of the centrifuge bowl breaking at high speed.However, the root cause for the centrifuge bowl leak/break could not be determined based on the information provided.The device history record review did not result in any related nonconformances and this kit lot had passed all lot release testing.A material trace of the centrifuge bowl assembly and its components used to build this kit lot also found no related nonconformances.No further actions required.This investigation is now complete.The assessment is based on information available at the time of the investigation.Complaints are monitored through tracking and trending.If a trend is detected, further investigation will be conducted.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The customer called to report a centrifuge bowl leak/break, drive tube leak/break, alarm #7: blood leak (centrifuge chamber) alarm, and noise that occurred during a treatment procedure.The customer stated that at about twenty five minutes into the treatment, there was a loud banging noise and then a leak was noticed within the centrifuge chamber.The customer reported that there was no obvious button to press on the instrument's screen so they immediately turned off the instrument.The customer stated that this all happened very quickly but they did notice a fluid leak message on the instrument's screen when they turned off the instrument.The customer reported that there had been no other alarms up to that point.The customer stated that the treatment was aborted with no return of blood/products to the patient.The customer reported that the volume that remained within the kit was around 200 to 300 ml.The customer stated that the patient was in stable condition and was not impacted by the incident.The customer reported that the patient was treated on another instrument.The customer stated that the centrifuge bowl was in many pieces and the drive tube was "sheared" into more than one piece.The customer reported that the very bottom of the centrifuge bowl was still in place.The customer stated that they remembered doing their usual check in order to ensure that the drive tube was correctly installed in both the upper and lower bearings retainer clips of the centrifuge frame.The customer reported that this check involved both a visual inspection and the swinging of the centrifuge frame.Photos were submitted for investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM
Type of Device
CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
THERAKOS, INC
bedminster NJ
Manufacturer (Section G)
THERAKOS, INC.
10 north high street
suite 300
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
megan vernak
1425 us route 206
bedminster, NJ 07921
MDR Report Key6992023
MDR Text Key91528697
Report Number2523595-2017-00194
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
P860003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/31/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Nurse
Device Expiration Date07/01/2019
Device Model NumberNOT APPLICABLE
Device Catalogue NumberCLXECP
Device Lot NumberF126
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/04/2017
Initial Date FDA Received10/31/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/13/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-