(b)(4).Analysis of the returned device revealed that the device does not have any visual failure.The carrier was actuated three times and it extended and retracted without any issues.Also, it was actuated (deployed) three times with the suture and the needle entered in the slot without any issues.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.Based on all gathered information and investigation results, there is no evidence of either the alleged issue or any defect which could have contributed to the event.Therefore, the reported issue was unable to be confirmed.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label. .
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a capio¿ device was used during a sacrospinous ligament fixation procedure performed on (b)(6).According to the complainant, during procedure, upon deployment of the mesh arm in the sacrospinous ligament, the needle detached and the carrier failed to retract.The physician had to leave the needle in the patient.The procedure was completed with another capio¿ device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|