• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. LINX REFLUX MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. LINX REFLUX MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number LXMC16
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Sepsis (2067); Perforation of Esophagus (2399)
Event Date 07/22/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Following a laparoscopic anti-reflux procedure, a patient was hospitalized due to surgical leak resulting in explant of the linx device.The linx device was used as part of the anti-reflux procedure.-anti-reflux procedure including hernia repair and linx device implantation occurred on (b)(6) 2017.-during hernia repair, it was noted that the hernia was larger than expected and a large amount of tissue dissection was required.-the posterior vagus nerve was cut during the implant procedure.-the device was well tolerated on (b)(6) 2017.-patient was septic and admitted to the hospital on (b)(6) 2017.-computer tomography angiography (cta) on (b)(6) 2017 showed an esophageal perforation.-device explant on (b)(6) 2017 when the patient was "finally healthy enough" to have device removed.-during explant, the device was below the ge junction due to either less than ideal placement or movement.
 
Event Description
Following a laparoscopic anti-reflux procedure, a patient was hospitalized due to surgical leak resulting in explant of the linx device.The linx device was used as part of the anti-reflux procedure.Anti-reflux procedure including a robotic paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair with biological mesh and linx device implantation occurred on (b)(6) 2017.During hernia repair, it was noted that the hernia was larger than expected and a large amount of tissue dissection was required.The posterior vagus nerve was "inadvertently" cut during the implant procedure.The patient remained in the hospital to recover from the hernia repair and implant.The device was well tolerated on (b)(6) 2017.Patient was septic and a surgical leak was discovered on (b)(6) 2017.The leak was into the left chest, no the mediastinum.Computer tomography angiography (cta) on (b)(6) 2017 showed an esophageal perforation.Patient underwent surgery including a left thoracotomy and a drainage procedure.The patient was medically paralyzed for 1 month after implant.The patient's stomach re-herniated.The physician believes this was due to coughing or retching in the first few days after the hernia repair was performed, which "undid" or "ripped" the repair.A barium swallow showed that the linx device "slipped onto the stomach", "was in the wrong place", and "was expanded." the physician believes the reason for the device's position was "it did not have the anchor of the posterior vagus nerve." device explant on (b)(6) 2017 when the patient was "finally healthy enough" to have device removed.Patient is "doing much better" as of (b)(6) 2017.
 
Event Description
Following a laparoscopic anti-reflux procedure, a patient was hospitalized due to surgical leak resulting in explant of the linx device.The linx device was used as part of the anti-reflux procedure.-anti-reflux procedure including a robotic paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair with biological mesh and linx device implantation occurred on (b)(6) 2017 -during hernia repair, it was noted that the hernia was larger than expected and a large amount of tissue dissection was required.-the posterior vagus nerve was "inadvertently" cut during the implant procedure.-the patient remained in the hospital to recover from the hernia repair and implant.-the device was well tolerated on (b)(6) 2017.-patient was septic and a surgical leak was discovered on (b)(6) 2017.The leak was into the left chest, no the mediastinum.-computer tomography angiography (cta) on (b)(6) 2017 showed an esophageal perforation.-patient underwent surgery including a left thoracotomy and a drainage procedure.-the patient was medically paralyzed for 1 month after implant.-the patient's stomach re-herniated.The physician believes this was due to coughing or retching in the first few days after the hernia repair was performed, which "undid" or "ripped" the repair.-a barium swallow showed that the linx device "slipped onto the stomach", "was in the wrong place", and "was expanded." the physician believes the reason for the device's position was "it did not have the anchor of the posterior vagus nerve." -device explant on (b)(6) 2017 when the patient was "finally healthy enough" to have device removed.-patient is "doing much better" as of (b)(6) 2017.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
-updated to include device information.-updated to include device manufacture date.-updated to include manufacturing review method code.-updated report date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LINX REFLUX MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN 55126
MDR Report Key6999324
MDR Text Key90969074
Report Number3008766073-2017-00130
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005363
UDI-Public00855106005363
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/03/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/31/2021
Device Model NumberLXMC16
Device Lot Number14418
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/20/2017
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/06/2017
Initial Date FDA Received11/03/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/01/2017
01/03/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/27/2017
01/08/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Disability;
Patient Age69 YR
-
-