Lot and serial number of the disposable device not provided by the complainant, therefore the expiration date is not known.The device is not being returned therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.Lot number of the disposable device not provided by the complainant, therefore the manufacture date is not known.Device history record (dhr) review was unable to be conducted for the disposable device as the identification numbers were not provided by the complainant.Reference internal complaint (b)(4).
|
It was reported the physician performed a myosure procedure for uterine tissue removal on (b)(6) 2017 and the patient was discharged home.All subsequent bleeding was resolved.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient presented to her general practioner (gp) and exhibited a "smelly discharge".The physician put the patient on oral augmentin and metronidazole for a week.In the beginning of (b)(6) 2017, the patient presented to the hospital with a secondary infection, group b streptococcus (gbs).The physician prescribed more antibiotics.On (b)(6) 2017, it was reported by the doctor "i spoke to the patient's son, who is her main caregiver.He feels that her vaginal discharge had improved with the antibiotics.He also thinks that her bleeding is actually from her rectum (from constipation, rather than vaginal).She remains well, with no fevers/pain".
|