(b)(4).Dr.(b)(6) was performing a left infraclavicular catheter placement.According to the doctor, they could not get any stimulation.He said he usually only inserts the catheter a few centimeters past the tip of the needle.When they could not get a stimulation, the needle and catheter were pulled out together.This is when he said the catheter sheered and left a piece in the patient.The procedure was completed with a 2nd kit and broken piece was surgically removed 7 days later.Hospital would not release catheter being held in pathology but i was able to examine it and take pictures.The amount of catheter left in the patient (close to 7 cm) is inconsistent with the doctor's description of the procedure.When dr.(b)(6) was unable to stimulate, rather than remove the catheter and needle together, the tuohy needle should have been removed first, leaving the catheter in place.At that time the catheter could then be removed safely.There is nothing i observed on the catheter or 50 mm tuohy needle that indicated any flaws that could have contributed to the sheering of the catheter.Per the information at (b)(6) pathology lab: date of procedure: (b)(6) 2017.Date of removal of catheter piece: (b)(6) 2017 (b)(4).Catheter pieces reviewed and pictures taken on (b)(6) 2017.
|
(b)(4).Initial reporters narrative: dr.(b)(6) was performing a left infraclavicular catheter placement.According to the doctor, they could not get any stimulation.He said he usually only inserts the catheter a few centimeters past the tip of the needle.When they could not get a stimulation, the needle and catheter were pulled out together.This is when he said the catheter sheered and left a piece in the patient.The procedure was completed with a 2nd kit and broken piece was surgically removed 7 days later.Hospital would not release catheter being held in pathology but i was able to examine it and take pictures.The amount of catheter left in the patient (close to 7cm) is inconsistent with the doctor's description of the procedure.When dr.(b)(6) was unable to stimulate, rather than remove the catheter and needle together, the tuohy needle should have been removed first, leaving the catheter in place.At that time the catheter could then be removed safely.There is nothing i observed on the catheter or 50mm tuohy needle that indicated any flaws that could have contributed to the sheering of the catheter.Per the information at (b)(6) pathology lab: date of procedure: (b)(6) 2017.Date of removal of catheter piece: (b)(6) 2017.(b)(6).Catheter pieces reviewed and pictures taken on (b)(6) 2017.
|