• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN, IRVINE PIPELINE FLEX; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN, IRVINE PIPELINE FLEX; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Model Number PED-425-20
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 10/10/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The pipeline flex braid remains implanted in the patient; the pipeline flex delivery wire (pushwire) was not returned to the manufacturer, therefore, device evaluation cannot be performed.Photos of broken distal segment was received.Based on the photos provided by the reporter, the reported pushwire break at the distal segment was confirmed.As the actual device cannot be evaluated, the cause of the clinical experience could not be determined.It is possible that the patient's "severe vessel tortuosity" might have contributed to the "severe friction" reported during retrieval of the pushwire.The continuation of pushwire retrieval despite of the "severe friction" could have subsequently causing the pushwire to detach at the proximal wire weld.Review of lot history record showed the finished device met all manufacturing requirements and specifications during final assembly and quality inspection.All products are 100% inspected for damages and irregularities during manufacturing.Per pipeline flex embolization device instruction for use (ifu), the user should: ¿discontinue delivery of the device if high force or excessive friction is encountered.Identify the cause of the resistance and remove device and microcatheter simultaneously.Advancement of the ped against resistance may result in device damage or patient injury.Never advance or withdraw an intraluminal device against resistance until the cause of resistance is determined by fluoroscopy.If the cause cannot be determined, withdraw the catheter.Movement of the micro catheter against resistance may result in damage to the micro catheter, or the vessel.Do not use in patients in whom the angiography demonstrates the anatomy is not appropriate for endovascular treatment, due to conditions such as severe intracranial vessel tortuosity or stenosis.¿ if information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that the distal segment broke off the pushwire of a pipeline flex device inside the patient after the braid was deployed.The pipeline flex device was used for flow diversion treatment of this patient's saccular aneurysm at the ophthalmic segment of left internal carotid artery.The aneurysm had max diameter of 7 mm and neck width of 6 mm.The landing zone artery measured 3.75 mm distally and 4.25 proximally.Vessel tortuosity was described as severe.It was reported the device was prepared as indicated in the ifu.A non-medtronic microcatheter was used to deliver the pipeline flex device.The braid was deployed and implanted as anticipated.After the deployment, there was severe friction during retrieval of the pushwire.The distal segment of the push wire broke off at the proximal bumper.The broken segment was removed from the patient by using a guidewire.There was no injury to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation the pushwire of the reported pipeline flex embolization system was returned for analysis.As received, the pipeline flex pushwire appeared to be detached at the hypotube proximal to the wire weld.The distal hypotube appeared to be stretched, and a bend was found at 27.5cm from the proximal end of the pushwire.Based on the product analysis, the report of ¿pushwire detach at hypotube proximal to the wire weld¿ was confirmed.A review of the manufacturing process did not uncover any deficiencies.The review of lot history records shows that the finished device met all manufacturing requirements and specifications during final assembly and quality inspection.Therefore manufacturing has been ruled out as a potential cause.The damages exhibited on the returned pipeline flex pushwire: proximal wire (bending) and hypotube (stretching), it appears there was excessive forced used (pushing and pulling).The patient's ¿severe vessel tortuosity¿ might have contributed to the severe resistance during retrieval; subsequently causing the pipeline flex pushwire to detach at the hypotube proximal to the wire weld.The manufacturer's instruction for use states, "caution: if high forces or excessive friction is encountered during delivery, discontinue delivery of the device and identify the cause of the resistance, remove device and micro catheter simultaneously.Advancement of the pipeline¿ flex embolization device against resistance may result in damage or patient injury.If the delivery wire cannot be retracted into the micro catheter, carefully remove the delivery wire and micro catheter simultaneously.Do not use in patients in whom the angiography demonstrates the anatomy is not appropriate for endovascular treatment, due to conditions such as severe intracranial vessel tortuosity or stenosis.¿ if information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PIPELINE FLEX
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN, IRVINE
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN, IRVINE
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
tricha miles
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
9496801221
MDR Report Key7004340
MDR Text Key92197979
Report Number2029214-2017-01230
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
P100018.S011
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/25/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/18/2018
Device Model NumberPED-425-20
Device Lot NumberA123393
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/07/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/10/2017
Initial Date FDA Received11/06/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/16/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/25/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/19/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age42 YR
Patient Weight85
-
-