• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number D134805
Device Problem Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/19/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.Manufacturer's ref.No: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation with a thermocool smart touch bidirectional sf catheter, and during the procedure, a magnetic sensor error (402 error code) occurred.The catheter was replaced, which resolved the issue.No patient consequences were reported.The potential that a magnetic sensor error could cause or contribute to an adverse event is remote.As a result, this was not an mdr reportable event.On 9/25/2017, the bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.A preliminary visual inspection found nothing unusual about the catheter.However, on (b)(6) 2017, a second visual inspection was performed, and the pebax was found to be damaged with reddish brown material underneath.Scanning electron microscopy performed on (b)(6) 2017 confirmed these findings.Multiple attempts were made to obtain additional information regarding the condition of the returned catheter, but none was made available.The presence of reddish brown material under the pebax is an expected finding after these procedures, and is not mdr reportable.However, the damage to the pebax is reportable, as exposure to the internal catheter components presents a possible risk to the patient.The awareness date for this complaint has been reset to 10/18/2017, the date of the reportable findings.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a patient underwent an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation with a thermocool smart touch bidirectional sf catheter, and during the procedure, a magnetic sensor error (402 error code) occurred.On 9/25/2017, the bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.A preliminary visual inspection found nothing unusual about the catheter.However, on (b)(6) 2017, a second visual inspection was performed, and the pebax was found to be damaged with reddish brown material underneath.The returned device was visually inspected, and the pebax was found to be damaged with reddish material inside.The catheter was evaluated for eeprom, and the sensor functionality was tested on a carto 3 system.Eeprom data demonstrates the catheter was properly calibrated during manufacturing.The catheter was recognized by the carto 3 system, but errors 105 and 106 (magnetic sensor failure and force sensor failure) were displayed.The catheter was then dissected, and it was determined that the root cause was an internal sensor failure.Per this condition, scanning electron microscopy was performed.The results showed evidence of damage with an opening on the surface of the pebax.It is possible that the damage was caused by contact with an unknown object.No other anomalies were observed.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.During the manufacturing process, all catheters are inspected for visual damage prior to packaging.On-line inspections and functional tests are in place to prevent catheters with this type of damage from leaving the facility.The customer complaint has been verified.The root cause of the lost electrical continuity at the sensor could not be determined.Based on the available analysis finding results, the damage on the pebax does not appear to be caused by any internal bwi processes, as there is evidence that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Manufacturers reference number: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF
Type of Device
CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
33 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte
1820parque industrial salvacar
juarez 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
joaquin kurz
33 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
949789-383
MDR Report Key7007867
MDR Text Key92318883
Report Number2029046-2017-01107
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
UDI-Device Identifier10846835010183
UDI-Public(01)10846835010183(11)170615(17)180531(10)17689355L
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/18/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2018
Device Model NumberD134805
Device Catalogue NumberD134805
Device Lot Number17689355L
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/25/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/18/2017
Initial Date FDA Received11/07/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/18/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/04/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured06/15/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-