• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOLOGIX INC. AFX; BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOLOGIX INC. AFX; BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT Back to Search Results
Model Number BA25-110/I20-30
Device Problems Hole In Material (1293); Leak/Splash (1354); Stretched (1601)
Patient Problems Aneurysm (1708); Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 10/16/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The devices involved in the event will not be returned for evaluation, they remain implanted in the patient.If additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
The patient was initially implanted with a bifurcated stent, two suprarenal aortic extensions and a limb stent.A routine follow up showed aneurysm sac growth and a possible type 3b endoleak.On (b)(6) 2017 the patient had a secondary procedure completed.The physician elected to implant an additional bifurcated stent and a suprarenal aortic extension.The final patient status is unknown.To date there have been no additional adverse events reported for this patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
At the completion of the clinical evaluation and based on the information received, there was substantial evidence to support the following reported events: type 3b endoleak of the mb, aneurysm enlargement (+6mm/38m), and reline with mb and sr extension.The following additional events were also noted: (b)(6) 2017 (at 45 months post implant) and dilation of proximal main body stent by 36% (3.4 x 3.2cm).The most likely cause of the compromised stent graft integrity was related to the strata graft material with stent dilation of the proximal main body of 36%.Additionally, the oversized cuff for the main body diameter (off-label) likely contributed to the event.Associated clinical harms for this device failure included: type 3b endoleak, aneurysm enlargement, and a secondary endovascular procedure.The final patient disposition was unknown.To date there have been no additional adverse events reported for this patient.The manufacturing lot review confirmed all devices met specifications prior to release.Endologix continues to investigate this event and similar events to ensure the highest quality and patient safety.A root cause investigation was carried out for all afx complaints having an identified failure mode of a type 3b endoleak.Endologix implemented the following corrective actions with the intent of reducing type 3b endoleak events; upgraded graft material (i.E.Duraply) and updates to the ifu and additional physician training.The change to duraply graft material and the ifu changes were put in place (b)(6) 2014.The type 3b endoleak rate for afx manufactured and implanted before these corrective actions were put in place is trending at 2.5%.Since the corrective actions were implemented, the type 3b endoleak events reported for afx devices has been reduced to less than 0.2%.(b)(4).No codes removed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFX
Type of Device
BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOLOGIX INC.
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
victor arellano
2 musick
irvine, CA 92618
9495984671
MDR Report Key7031223
MDR Text Key92020351
Report Number2031527-2017-00600
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/21/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2014
Device Model NumberBA25-110/I20-30
Device Lot Number1101031-014
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/16/2017
Initial Date FDA Received11/14/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/16/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/21/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/05/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
-
-