• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOLOGIX INC. AFX; BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOLOGIX INC. AFX; BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT Back to Search Results
Model Number BA28-90/I20-30
Device Problems Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Hole In Material (1293); Leak/Splash (1354); Stretched (1601); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 10/17/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The devices involved in the event will not be returned for evaluation, they remain implanted in the patient.If additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
The patient was initially implanted with a bifurcated stent, a suprarenal aortic extension, an infrarenal aortic extension and two limb extensions.A routine follow up computed tomography (ct) showed the patient had a type 3a endoleak or a possible type 3b endoleak.A secondary intervention was completed and the patient was reported to have a type 3a endoleak with component separation between the main body and left iliac limb extension.The physician implanted two additional limb extensions to bridge the initial limb extension and the main body graft.The patient is reported to be doing well post procedure.There have been no additional adverse events reported for this patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
At the completion of the complaint investigation and based on the information received, the clinical evaluation was able to confirm a type 3a endoleak of the bifurcated stent and a limb extension.Additionally the clinical evaluation identified a dilation and movement of the proximal cuff as well as a dilation and type 3b endoleak of the main body.The most likely cause of the distal type 3a endoleak with complete component separation was the off-label, tortuous iliac anatomy (intentional user error).The most likely cause of the type 3b endoleak of the main body stent (breached and stretched fabric) was the use of strata material in combination with aggressive ballooning at implant to resolve an intraoperative endoleak, and the loss of overlap at both the distal and proximal sites.The most likely cause of the stent movement of the cuff was a combination of a low, but adequate placement of the cuff at implant and the dilation of the cuff diameter over time.The most likely cause of the compromised stent graft integrity of the cuff (stretched fabric) was the use of strata material.There was approximately a 50% aortic stenosis caused by intra-stent mural thrombus within the cuff and main body stents.Due to the lack of medical information surrounding the repair event, procedure-related harms and the final patient disposition could not be determined.There have been no reports of further negative patient sequelae.The manufacturing lot review confirmed all devices met specifications prior to release.A root cause investigation was carried out for all afx complaints having an identified failure mode of a type 3a endoleak.The root causes have been identified as; patient anatomy including large aneurysms, aneurysm sac angulation, significant aortic neck angulation and lack of thrombus; patient conditions including disease progression or anatomical changes post implant; off label product use including patient anatomy, overlap length, oversizing between components, and placement of the devices within the anatomy of the patient.Endologix implemented the following corrective actions to reduce the type 3a endoleak events; sizing guidance and instructions were updated in the ifu and released on 06/17/2015, field training was completed by 08/03/2015.Since the corrective actions were implemented the type iiia events have been reduced significantly and are well within the acceptable range per our risk assessment.A root cause investigation was carried out for all afx complaints having an identified failure mode of a type 3b endoleak.Endologix implemented the following corrective actions with the intent of reducing type 3b endoleak events; upgraded graft material (i.E.Duraply) and updates to the ifu and additional physician training.The change to duraply graft material and the ifu changes were put in place (b)(6) 2014.The type 3b endoleak rate for afx manufactured and implanted before these corrective actions were put in place is trending at 2.5%.Since the corrective actions were implemented, the type 3b endoleak events reported for afx devices has been reduced to <0.2%.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFX
Type of Device
BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOLOGIX INC.
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
victor arellano
2 musick
irvine, CA 92618
9495984671
MDR Report Key7035754
MDR Text Key92155391
Report Number2031527-2017-00605
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/30/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2017
Device Model NumberBA28-90/I20-30
Device Lot Number1101187-027
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/17/2017
Initial Date FDA Received11/15/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/17/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/30/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/18/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
-
-