• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIO-RAD MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS GMBH REAGENT RED BLOOD CELLS BIOTESTCELL 3

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIO-RAD MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS GMBH REAGENT RED BLOOD CELLS BIOTESTCELL 3 Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 816085100
Device Problems False Negative Result (1225); Defective Device (2588)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 10/07/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This is our combined initial and final report on this incident.
 
Event Description
The customer reported a false negative reaction of a patient sample with a history of an anti-e when tested with biotestcell 3 on tango optimo.The customer returned the patient sample that had caused a false negative test result and the affected cell #2 of the supposedly defective product biotestcell 3.The customer provided two patient samples labelled # (b)(4).According to the customer's documentation the samples are from the same patient but with different dates of withdrawal.At the time we received the patient samples and the complaint sample the supposedly defective product was already expired.Nevertheless the patient samples were tested with the complaint sample of biotestcell 3 on tango optimo.We could confirm the customer´s finding.The patient samples were tested with a current lot of biotestcell 3 and yielded the same result.Additionally the patient samples were tested in different tube methods.Both patient samples yielded clearly strong positive results only when using the enzyme method.In the indirect anti-human globulin test the reactions were negative.The tango optimo also uses the indirect anti-human globulin method.As a summary of all test results the anti-e of patient is supposed to be an antibody with a reaction optimum in the enzyme method.The instruction for use contains a note in the section limitation: "negative reactions will be obtained if the sample contains antibodies present in concentrations too low to be detected by the test method employed.No test method is capable of detecting all red cell antibodies." the retention sample of the supposedly defective lot was tested within its shelf life on tango optimo with different samples and controls, e.G.Anti-e, and reacted as expected.Testing by our quality control laboratory confirmed that the allegedly defective lot of biotestcell 3 functions correctly.A review of the batch record documentation showed no irregularities which might have negatively affected the quality of both allegedly defective lots.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REAGENT RED BLOOD CELLS BIOTESTCELL 3
Type of Device
BIOTESTCELL 3
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIO-RAD MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
industriestrasse 1
dreieich, hessen 63303
GM  63303
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIO-RAD MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
industriestrasse 1
dreieich, hessen 63303
GM   63303
Manufacturer Contact
martina benkert
industriestrasse 1
dreieich, hessen 63303
GM   63303
MDR Report Key7037054
MDR Text Key93350888
Report Number9610824-2017-00089
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KSZ
UDI-Device Identifier07611969952687
UDI-Public07611969952687
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/16/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/23/2017
Device Catalogue Number816085100
Device Lot Number8735031-00
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/01/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/19/2017
Initial Date FDA Received11/16/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-