• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD RESPIRATORY HUMIDIFIER; BTT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD RESPIRATORY HUMIDIFIER; BTT Back to Search Results
Model Number MR850
Device Problem Device Issue (2379)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Method: the complaint mr850 humidifier and rt132 infant circuit were not returned to fisher & paykel healthcare (fph) in (b)(4) for investigation.Our investigation is therefore based on the photographs and information provided by the hospital.Result: the photographs provided show that a sebac humidifier chamber 04314ns and sebac vni infant flow circuit were connected to the rt132 circuit.The hospital doctor stated that the sebac chamber was manually filled with water and the hospital biomed stated that misuse not a fault with the humidification system, contributed to the event.Fph has received no information from the hospital indicating a fault with the mr850 humidifier or the rt132 infant circuit.Conclusion: user error contributed to the event.The sebac chamber and circuit used with the mr850 humidifier and rt132 circuit are not approved fph products.Our user instructions that accompany the mr850 respiratory humidifier states: -the use of breathing circuits, chambers or other accessories which are not approved by fisher & paykel healthcare may impair performance or compromise safety.An fph representative held four training sessions with the hospital staff and has shown staff how to correctly use the mr850 humidifier.After completing the training sessions the hospital staff have not observed any further condensation problems.Condensate in the humidification system is an expected side effect of heated pass-over humidification systems in many conditions, and may vary between light misting to water droplets that form on the wall of cool breathing circuit tubing.The amount of condensate in the ventilation system is influenced by a number of multiple set up and environmental factors, including use of third party breathing circuits not approved by fph.
 
Event Description
A hospital in (b)(6) reported to the ansm that the mr850 respiratory humidifier and a rt132 infant breathing circuit were used on a pediatric patient.A nurse removing circuit condensation disconnected the circuit and water rose up the nose of the patient.The flat heart tracing alarm was heard and the nurse removed the circuit from the patient and performed aspiration.The patient recovered and a physician was informed.The chest of the patient was x-rayed and there were no consequences from the inhaled condensation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESPIRATORY HUMIDIFIER
Type of Device
BTT
Manufacturer (Section D)
FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD
15 maurice paykel place
east tamaki
auckland, 2013
NZ  2013
Manufacturer (Section G)
FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD
15 maurice paykel place
east tamaki
2013
NZ   2013
Manufacturer Contact
sharon kuruvilla
173 technology drive
suite 100
irvine, CA 92618
9494534000
MDR Report Key7039995
MDR Text Key93202357
Report Number9611451-2017-01045
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BTT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K110019
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/18/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMR850
Device Catalogue NumberMR850
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/18/2017
Initial Date FDA Received11/16/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/25/2006
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-