At the completion of the clinical evaluation and based on the information received, there was substantial evidence to support the following reported events: ruptured aorta, dilation of sr stent by 24%, and reline procedure-bilateral renal artery snorkels.There was unsubstantial evidence to support the following reported events: aneurysm enlargement and sr cuff movement (unable to determine length due to lack of comparison imaging).The following reported events have been refuted: hypotensive, rather the patient was hypertensive and controlled medically.The following additional events were noted: (b)(6) 2017 (at 60 months post implant); type 1a endoleak and dissection lra-stent placed.The most likely cause of the loss of seal was related to the distal movement of the suprarenal extension.A tiny blush endoleak was noted in the medical records, seen six months prior to this event.Unable to definitively determine additional contributing factors due to a lack of medical records/imaging prior to the time of the event.Associated clinical harms for this event included: type ia endoleak, aneurysm enlargement, rupture, pain, and a secondary endovascular procedure.Procedure related harms included: dissection of the left renal artery.The most likely cause of the dilation of the suprarenal cuff by 24% was related to the strata graft material.There were no associated clinical harms with the stent dilation.The final patient disposition was not ascertained.There have been no additional adverse events reported for this patient.The manufacturing lot review confirmed all devices met specifications prior to release.This complaint is not capa eligible at this time.These types of events will be monitored and trended as part of the quality system.(b)(4).
|