• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS MPA; AUTOMATED PREANALYTICAL SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS MPA; AUTOMATED PREANALYTICAL SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MPA
Device Problem High Test Results (2457)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 10/31/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occurred in (b)(6).(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The customer questioned abnormal results a sample for one patient that was aliquoted by the modular pre-analytic (mpa) system.The clinical chemistry analyzer used for the testing was not provided.Based on the data provided, the sample was erroneous for sodium (na), potassium (k), urea and creatinine.The initial na result was 152 (unit of measure not provided), the initial k result was 9.2 (unit of measure not provided), the initial urea result was 27.2 mmol/l and the initial creatinine result was 1206 (unit of measure not provided).These results were reported outside of the laboratory.The patient was sent to the "aed" where a new sample was obtained from the patient and tests were "normal." the actual results were not provided.The original primary sample tube was repeated and the results were normal.The repeat na result was 146, the repeat k result was 4.5, the repeat urea result was 4.9 mmol/l and the repeat creatinine result was 70.The customer believes the mpa aliquot cup was possibly contaminated with urine which affected the initial results received.The customer¿s unused clean cups sit directly below the sample loading area in open trays.The customer has now moved the trays containing the unused clean cups away from the sample loading area and they are now covered.There was no allegation that an adverse event occurred.The patient was discharged from the "aed" no reagent lot numbers or expiration dates were provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A specific root cause was not identified.Additional information was requested for investigation but was not provided.In an effort to confirm whether the sample was contaminated, the patient sample was spiked with urine to see the effect on the results.The experiment showed a similar erroneous result.Based on the information available, there is no indication this issue was caused by the mpa system.The mpa was checked and found to be operating within specification.The customer¿s unused clean cups sit directly below the sample loading area in open trays.The customer has now moved the trays containing the unused clean cups away from the sample loading area and they are now covered.Mishandling of the sample prior to going on the mpa may have been the cause of the issue.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MPA
Type of Device
AUTOMATED PREANALYTICAL SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
HITACHI HIGH TECH CORP.
882 ichige hitachinaka
na
ibaraki 312-8 504
JA   312-8504
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key7045264
MDR Text Key93450641
Report Number1823260-2017-02681
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JQP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/12/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMPA
Device Catalogue Number05575532001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/01/2017
Initial Date FDA Received11/20/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/01/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/12/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-