• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY Back to Search Results
Model Number 610-0001
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Loss of Vision (2139)
Event Date 10/10/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The explanted inlay was returned to the manufacturer and subjected to visual microscopic inspection and dimensional analysis.The edge thickness and diameter were measured and found to be within specifications.Cuts and particles were observed on the device, but these findings are consistent with findings for corneal inlays that have been explanted since surgical instruments are required to remove the device from the eye and placed it in a hydrated storage container for transport.The device history record review of the manufacturing lot was performed and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings related to the reported issue.Decreased best corrected distance visual acuity is listed in the device labeling as a known potential risk.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The patient underwent uneventful implantation of the raindrop corneal inlay in the right eye on (b)(6) 2016.Postoperatively, the patient's best corrected distance visual acuity (bcdva) decreased from 20/20 (preoperatively) to 20/30- immediately prior to inlay explantation on (b)(6) 2017.The surgeon suspects that corneal flap striae may be a potential contributing factor, but this was not reported as an adverse event.Additional information is being requested to understand the relationship between the device and the event.The patient underwent uneventful implantation of the raindrop corneal inlay in the right eye on (b)(6) 2016.Postoperatively, the patient's best corrected distance visual acuity (bcdva) decreased from 20/20 (preoperatively) to 20/30- immediately prior to inlay explantation on (b)(6) 2017.The surgeon suspects that corneal flap striae may be a potential contributing factor, but this was not reported as an adverse event.Additional information is being requested to understand the relationship between the device and the event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY
Type of Device
CORNEAL INLAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer (Section G)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer Contact
pushpita singh
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste a1
lake forest, CA 92630-8835
9497072740
MDR Report Key7051386
MDR Text Key92726397
Report Number3005956347-2017-00141
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQE
UDI-Device Identifier10850394006013
UDI-Public(01)10850394006013
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150034
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/21/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date09/13/2019
Device Model Number610-0001
Device Catalogue NumberRD1-1
Device Lot Number002990
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/23/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/23/2017
Initial Date FDA Received11/21/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/13/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age48 YR
-
-