Model Number 3058 |
Device Problems
Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problems
Stroke/CVA (1770); Incontinence (1928); Unspecified Infection (1930); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Urinary Tract Infection (2120)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a consumer regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stimulation.It was reported that device did not work and the patient had not used the implant for years because it did not work; it was unknown when the device stopped working.It was noted the patient was using an ocital patch to help with their incontinence instead.No further complications were reported/anticipated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional review determined (b)(4) no longer apply to this event.Due to this correction it was determined the event is no longer reportable as a serious injury, but is reportable for malfunction.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Other applicable components are: product id 3889-28 lot# v249006 implanted: (b)(6)2009 product type lead.Device code (b)(4) applies to interstim ii and lead (lot# v249006).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received from the family member.Caller said the patient was recently in the hospital where the neurologist thought the patient might have had a mild stroke "resulting from several subsequent bladder infections;" the healthcare provider (hcp) wants the patient to do an mri.The caller then said the patient "doesn't exhibit signs of a stroke" and then further said the patient has had bladder infections "off and on" for about six months.The patient will be prescribed an antibiotic by their hcp which would eliminate the bladder infection, but it would reappear.The patient will have to remove the system because "they haven't used it in years.They never really mastered it, never really worked well, and never helped incontinence.They saw a manufacture representative (rep) who tried to educate them and make it work, but it didn't;" the decision was to abandon the system.No further patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|