• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION CDI BLOOD PARAMETER MONITORING SYSTEM 500; MONITOR, BLOOD-GAS, ON-LINE, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS-CDI BPM SYSTEM 500

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION CDI BLOOD PARAMETER MONITORING SYSTEM 500; MONITOR, BLOOD-GAS, ON-LINE, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS-CDI BPM SYSTEM 500 Back to Search Results
Model Number 500AHCT
Device Problem Thermal Decomposition of Device (1071)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/06/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation is in progress, but not yet concluded.Per customer, the unit passed all tests at start-up.
 
Event Description
It was reported that prior to use of the device for a cardiopulmonary bypass (cpb) procedure, there was an electrical burning smell coming from the device.As a result, an alternate device was employed.The surgical procedure was completed successfully.There was no delay, no blood loss, nor adverse consequences to the patient.Per clinical review: prior to going on bypass on (b)(6) 2017 the perfusionist on the case smelled what he considered an obvious electric smell.It was coming from the area of the heart lung machine (hlm) and blood parameter monitoring (bpm) system.Their bpm is plugged into the back of the hlm.Perfusion contacted their biomedical department, and they rolled the hlm out into the hallway.Once the set up was in the hallway, they deduced that the electrical burning smell was coming from the bpm.There was no smoke, nor flames, and the bpm unit was not hot.The units outer housing was not physically damaged.There was no delay in the surgery, the team used another hlm with another bpm.The patient had no harm, nor blood loss, and the surgical procedure was performed without concern.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During laboratory analysis, the product surveillance technician (pst) observed component c25 on the aux board assembly failed (burned) and was found to be the cause of smoke.The product will be sent to service to be brought to manufacturer¿s specifications before being returned to the customer.If additional information becomes available on this complaint that would alter the facts and/or conclusion, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported complaint was confirmed.The service repair technician (srt) replaced the auxiliary (aux) printed circuit board assembly (pcba).The unit operated to manufacturer's specifications.If additional information becomes available on this complaint that would alter the facts and/or conclusion, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CDI BLOOD PARAMETER MONITORING SYSTEM 500
Type of Device
MONITOR, BLOOD-GAS, ON-LINE, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS-CDI BPM SYSTEM 500
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION
6200 jackson road
ann arbor MI 48103
Manufacturer Contact
eileen dorsey
6200 jackson road
ann arbor, MI 48103
7346634145
MDR Report Key7067036
MDR Text Key94242241
Report Number1828100-2017-00535
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K133658
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/15/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number500AHCT
Device Catalogue Number500AHCT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/09/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/06/2017
Initial Date FDA Received11/29/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/30/2017
02/08/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/21/2017
02/15/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/06/2006
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-