(b)(4) is being used to capture the reported event of pneumoperitoneum.(b)(4) (infection) relates to the reported event of sepsis.The complainant indicated that the device has been disposed and will not be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on (b)(6) 2017 that a wallflex colonic stent was implanted in the sigmoid and descending colon to treat a malignant (t4/n2) colonic obstruction during a stent placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2017.Reportedly, the patient's anatomy was somewhat tortuous and was not dilated prior to stent placement.According to the complainant, on (b)(6) 2017, during the procedure, the physician was able to deploy the stent successfully.However, on the same day after the procedure, the patient was in pain.The physician performed an imaging procedure and the patient¿s proximal anatomy was noted to be perforated and there was free air in the patient's peritoneal space (pneumoperitoneum); the patient also presented with sepsis.The patient had to undergo colonic resection surgery to repair the perforation and was given antibiotics to treat the sepsis.The stent was excised during the surgery and the patient¿s anatomy was noted to be friable on the proximal side of the stricture.In the physician¿s assessment, the stent was related to the perforation, which caused the patient to develop sepsis.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient expired due to sepsis.
|