The customer alleged an issue with 3 aliquot samples generated from the cobas 8100 system from 3 different primary samples.The customer thinks a patient sample mismatch occurred.The aliquot samples were run on a cobas 8000 system connected to the cobas 8100 system.All 3 aliquot samples were from rack 80926.The aliquot sample in position 1 produced a sample alarm for glucose (glu).The aliquot sample in position 2 produced sodium (na) results of 205.0 (unit of measure not provided) and 206.2, magnesium (mg2) results of 0.00 (unit of measure not provided) and 0.00, and calcium (ca2) results of (-) 0.10 (unit of measure not provided) and (-) 0.11.All of these results were accompanied by data flags invalidating the results.These results were not reported outside of the laboratory because the customer knew they were incorrect.The aliquot samples in positions 1 and 2 were a different color than their respective primary sample color.The aliquot samples appeared to have more hemolysis than the samples in the primary tubes.The aliquot sample in position 3 was empty.There was no allegation that an adverse event occurred.At the time these samples were processed by the aliquot module of the 8100 system, a single holder transportation error occurred.Upon rerunning the primary sample tubes following the error, the correct results were received for all 3 affected samples.The customer pulled approximately 20 patient samples that had been run either before the transportation error occurred or after the transportation error occurred.The customer did have to correct results for an unspecified number of samples for calcium, creatinine, alp, bilrubin, gt and crp that had been released from the laboratory.There was no allegation that any patients were adversely affected.The field service engineer (fse) visited the customer site and did not identify anything that might have caused the transportation error alarm.According to the information available, the primary samples were correctly pipetted.The transportation error occurred after the primary samples were correctly pipetted; therefore it is not believed that the possible sample mismatch was due to the error message.The investigation did however confirm a difference in the hemolysis, lipemia and icterus results between the primary sample and aliquot samples.Investigations are ongoing.
|
The customer stated the issue occurred again for 3 new aliquot samples run on (b)(6) 2017 where the results were questioned.The results provided were not erroneous, however, the customer is alleging the system is aliquotting samples incorrectly.Patient 1 had an initial glucose result from the original tube of 7.33 (unit of measure not provided).The result from the aliquot was 6.76.Patient 2 had an initial glucose result from the original tube of 6.14.The result from the aliquot was 6.45.Patient 3 had an initial probnp result from the original tube of 2498 (unit of measure not provided).The result from the aliquot was 389.7.
|