• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC ONE-PART PERCUTANEOUS ENTRY NEEDLE; DRC TROCAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC ONE-PART PERCUTANEOUS ENTRY NEEDLE; DRC TROCAR Back to Search Results
Model Number G00166
Device Problem Bent (1059)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/16/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty, the tip of the one-part percutaneous entry needle was bent and incompatible with the associated product model.According to the initial reporter, the needle did not come into contact with the patient.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence, nor did the patient experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A photograph of the device was received from the customer.A photographic inspection was performed, and the results were included in the investigation.Investigation - evaluation : a review of the device history record, drawing, manufacturing instructions, quality control, and a photographic inspection were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore no physical examination could be performed.However, a photograph of the complaint device was received for evaluation.The photo shows a needle that is bent close to the distal end.Additionally, a document-based investigation was performed.The manufacturing documents in place at the time of the event were reviewed and it was found that the device aspect in question was visually inspected by quality control and no notable gaps in production or processing controls were noted.There is no evidence to suggest the finished product was not made to specifications.Numerous design verification and validation activities have been performed to ensure that this device meets design requirements.Review of the device history record of the finished product shows no nonconforming events that could contribute to this failure mode.A complaint history search revealed that there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, no product returned, and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.Per the risk assessment, no further action is required.Monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation - evaluation: a review of the complaint history, drawings, device history record, documentation, manufacturing instructions, specifications, and quality control was conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore no physical examination could be performed.However, a document-based investigation was performed.The manufacturing documents in place at the time of the event were reviewed and it was found that the device aspect in question was visually inspected by quality control and no notable gaps in production or processing controls were noted.There is no evidence to suggest the finished product was not made to specifications.Numerous design verification and validation activities have been performed to ensure that this device meets design requirements.Review of the device history record of the finished product shows no nonconforming events that could contribute to this failure mode.A complaint history search revealed that there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, no product returned, and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.Per the risk assessment, no further action is required.Monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ONE-PART PERCUTANEOUS ENTRY NEEDLE
Type of Device
DRC TROCAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key7072543
MDR Text Key93869750
Report Number1820334-2017-04313
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRC
UDI-Device Identifier00827002001664
UDI-Public(01)00827002001664(17)201118(10)6390551
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/17/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberG00166
Device Catalogue NumberSDN-18-7.0
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/27/2017
Initial Date FDA Received11/30/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/21/2018
03/22/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/13/2018
04/17/2018
Date Device Manufactured11/18/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-