• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. ALTIVATE SHOULDER; ENCORE REVERSE SHOULDER HUMERAL STEM, STD, SZ6X108MM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. ALTIVATE SHOULDER; ENCORE REVERSE SHOULDER HUMERAL STEM, STD, SZ6X108MM Back to Search Results
Model Number 509-01-432
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 11/08/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Revision surgery - due to cement failure.The stem and poly were removed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reason for this revision surgery was due to cement failure.The in-vivo length of patient service for the implant was 4 months.There is no information in this complaint about any patient injuries, activities, or accidents that may have contributed to the need for this revision surgery.There are no reported pre-existing patient health conditions.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the implant device history records (dhr) shows that the reported component used in the previous surgery met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmrs) associated with the product that may have contributed to the event.The device was within its expiration date at the time of use during the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported device showed no present trends or on-going issues that are in need of review.This event is deemed to be non-product related.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to the cement failure.There are multiple factors that may contribute to the event that are outside the control of djo surgical are excessive loads or torques, poor penetration of cement in to the bone, improper surgical procedure, poor bone quality, patient activities or trauma.No additional information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities that may have contributed to the event and hence a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: the reason for this revision surgery was due to cement failure.The in-vivo length of patient service for the implant was 4 months.There is no information in this complaint about any patient injuries, activities, or accidents that may have contributed to the need for this revision surgery.There are no reported pre-existing patient health conditions.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the implant device history records (dhr) shows that the reported component used in the previous surgery met design and manufacturing requirements.There was a non-conforming material report (ncmr) # (b)(4) associated with the part 530-06-108, reverse shoulder humeral stem, size 6mm standard which documents a nonconformance that out of 15 quantity lot 2 items were rejected as the coating bulge was not within boundary lines on overlay.It was reworked with suitable operations and were accepted.The device was within its expiration date at the time of use during the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported device showed no present trends or on-going issues that are in need of review.This event is deemed to be non-product related.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to the cement failure.There are multiple factors that may contribute to the event that are outside the control of djo surgical are excessive loads or torques, poor penetration of cement in to the bone, improper surgical procedure, poor bone quality, patient activities or trauma.No additional information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities that may have contributed to the event and hence a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ALTIVATE SHOULDER
Type of Device
ENCORE REVERSE SHOULDER HUMERAL STEM, STD, SZ6X108MM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd
austin TX 78758 5445
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd
austin TX 78758 5445
Manufacturer Contact
teffany hutto
9800 metric blvd
austin, TX 78758-5445
MDR Report Key7074739
MDR Text Key93456767
Report Number1644408-2017-01056
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PHX
UDI-Device Identifier00888912144650
UDI-Public(01)00888912144650
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K141990
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/03/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/28/2021
Device Model Number509-01-432
Device Catalogue Number530-06-108
Device Lot Number403T1010
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/08/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/01/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/08/2017
01/03/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/19/2017
01/03/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/22/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
530-06-108, LOT 403T1010
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age74 YR
-
-