Model Number UCR |
Device Problem
Device Operational Issue (2914)
|
Patient Problem
Perforation (2001)
|
Event Date 11/08/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The referenced co2 regulation unit was not returned to olympus for evaluation.The cause of the reported event could not be determined at this time.However, user handling could not be ruled out as a contributory factor to the reported event.The instruction manual warns users when the endoscopic co2 regulation unit is used in combination with the upper/lower gastrointestinal endoscope that, 1) over-insufflating the lumen may cause patient pain, injury, bleeding, gas embolism and/or perforation.2) anytime you observe an irregularity in the endoscopic co2 regulation unit, immediately stop using the endoscopic regulation unit and withdraw the endoscope from the patient slowly as described in the endoscope¿s instruction manual.
|
|
Event Description
|
Olympus was informed that the patient¿s cecum was perforated during a colonoscopy procedure.The patient had two polyps removed using an olympus colonoscope (cf-hq190l), co2 regulation unit (ucr) and a non-olympus hot snare.However, following the procedure the patient complained of abdominal pain.No additional procedures were performed for the perforation; however, the patient did experience a longer stay for iv antibiotics, pain medication and imaging studies that revealed free air in the abdomen.The patient had a follow-up visit with the doctor on (b)(6) 2017 and the patient is doing well.The user facility reported it was a difficult procedure due to restricted mobility inside the patient¿s colon and they are unsure which device caused or contributed to the perforation.1of 2 reports.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide additional information provided by the original equipment manufacturer (oem).No device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation to date.The oem performed an investigation based on the available information.The oem conducted a review of the device history records (dhr) for the concern serial number and found no abnormalities during the manufacturing process.The complaints records were reviewed with no similar events related to the reported event and reported device.The device was sold in december 27, 2012 with no service records.Based on reported information, there is a high possibility that the perforation to the patient¿s colon was caused by the operator¿s technique and not caused by the ucr device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This supplemental report is being submitted to make a correction on the procode from fcx to hif.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|