• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON) O-ARM O2 IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERVENTIONAL FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON) O-ARM O2 IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERVENTIONAL FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number BI70002000
Device Problems Break (1069); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/07/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient information was unavailable from the site.A medtronic representative went to site to test the equipment.Representative reported that a front rotor fan fin was damaged and made a loud popping noise.The fan assembly was replaced to resolve the issue and a system checkout was performed.The hardware, software, and instruments passed the system checkout.The system was found to be fully functional.The suspect part has not been receive by the manufacturer for evaluation.
 
Event Description
A site representative reported that during spinal fusion procedure, a loud popping noise was heard from imaging system and a black plastic was falling from the system when closing the gantry around a patient.When opening the gantry, no noise was heard from the system and system was removed from the operating room (or).The procedure was completed without the use of imaging.There was a delay of less than 1 hour.No impact on patient outcome.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: patient id, age and gender provided.A medtronic representative reported that the issue occurred in a lumbar laminectomy with a pedicle screw fusion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient demographic information.Patient weight not available from the site.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The fan assembly for the imaging system was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Testing found that a fan blade was damaged and resulted in the reported issue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: a medtronic field service engineer clarified that the fan blade broke inside the system, and did not fall off until after the fan cover was removed while servicing the system.Additional information/response to fda request: attached with this submission is a copy of the response letter sent to the fda on (b)(4) 2018 with regards to a fda request for additional information ((b)(4)) that provides additional information and findings related to this mdr.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
O-ARM O2 IMAGING SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTERVENTIONAL FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON)
300 foster street
littleton MA 01460
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON)
300 foster street
littleton MA 01460
Manufacturer Contact
amos jarrette
navigation customer quality
826 coal creek circle
louisville, CO 80027-9710
7208903200
MDR Report Key7083886
MDR Text Key93818086
Report Number1723170-2017-04958
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OWB
UDI-Device Identifier00643169639683
UDI-Public00643169639683
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K151000
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/07/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Radiologic Technologist
Device Catalogue NumberBI70002000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/13/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/07/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/05/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/11/2017
02/16/2018
02/16/2018
04/30/2018
09/06/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/08/2018
03/06/2018
03/08/2018
05/29/2018
09/07/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/03/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age72 YR
-
-