• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 37800
Device Problems Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Electromagnetic Compatibility Problem (2927)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Twitching (2172); Electric Shock (2554)
Event Date 10/11/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Other applicable components are: product id: 4351-35, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2016, product type: lead.Product id: 4351-35, serial# (b)(6), implanted: (b)(6) 2016.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information received from a healthcare professional (hcp) via a manufacturer representative reported that two (2) weeks after implantation of the implantable neurostimulator (ins), the consumer began experiencing ¿twitching and a very slight shocking sensation¿ behind her other implantable device/pump.It was also noted that the consumer was quite highly statically charged and regularly gets electric shocks from clothing, etc., which could be connected to her eds condition.No troubleshooting was required as both the consumer and the hcp were not concerned about the twitching, as the hcp believed the pump could be sitting next to a small nerve because it only happened in certain positions.No interventions were planned.Additional information received reported the pump was implanted in the lower abdomen, and ins in left upper abdomen (extra-peritoneal).The devices were 10 cm at nearest points, the consumer was very tiny.The consumer was happy with both therapies.The sensation did disappear when the pump was turned off, and had not tried turning off the ins yet.There were no further complications reported and/or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported the cause of the twitching and slight shocking sensation were unknown, and the consumer suspected possible electrical connection between the two devices.Both devices remain implanted and the consumer was using both.It was noted that there were no further complications, though twitching was still present.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that they did try turning off the ins, and when turned off temporarily by the representative, the twitching did stop.It was noted that it was recommended to use the therapy as the consumer required it.It was also noted that the doctor was not concerned with the twitching.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the patient through a manufacturer representative reported they had ¿started experiencing ongoing issues¿ with the ins ¿sending painful electric shocks through her abdominal wall across to¿ her pump after the ins was implanted in 2016.It was stated that the ins was conducting electrical shocks to the patient¿s pump.Despite the patient¿s issue, she noted that she loved her device and that it ¿greatly improved her quality of life.¿ there were no surgical interventions planned or performed.Though the issue remained unresolved at the time of report, the ins remained implanted and in service.No further complications were reported or anticipated.Please see manufacturer report #3004209178-2017-19753 for information regarding the patient¿s pump.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the patient through a manufacturer representative reported they had ¿started experiencing ongoing issues¿ with the ins ¿sending painful electric shocks through her abdominal wall across to¿ her pump after the ins was implanted in 2016.It was stated that the ins was conducting electrical shocks to the patient¿s pump.Despite the patient¿s issue, she noted that she loved her device and that it ¿greatly improved her quality of life.¿ there were no surgical interventions planned or performed.Though the issue remained unresolved at the time of report, the ins remained implanted and in service.No further complications were reported or anticipated.Please see manufacturer report #3004209178-2017-19753 for information regarding the patient¿s pump.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the patient through a manufacturer representative reported they had met with their hcp the day prior to follow-up and was told that there was a way they ¿might be able to insulate the stomach by wrapping the omentum around it¿ and that this would ¿be less likely to conduct electricity through¿ to their implanted pump.The patient noted that they would ¿probably have the surgery done either way as the jolts behind the pump were quite painful.¿ it was further noted the surgery timing would depend on whether it was the ins that had damaged the pump or if it was something unrelated and that if it was the ins, that they ¿would probably have the surgery sooner rather than later to avoid a repeat failure.¿ the patient¿s hcp told the patient that he could ¿potentially do the surgery in a fortnight.¿ the patient planned to reach to her gastric consult still as of (b)(6) 2018.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENTERRA
Type of Device
INTESTINAL STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7088023
MDR Text Key94929535
Report Number3004209178-2017-24955
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
H990014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/22/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/28/2017
Device Model Number37800
Device Catalogue Number37800
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/09/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/06/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/11/2018
01/11/2018
08/27/2018
01/25/2019
01/25/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/18/2018
01/31/2018
09/21/2018
02/20/2019
02/22/2019
Date Device Manufactured03/07/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age32 YR
Patient Weight50
-
-