• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 4002C1040
Device Problems Kinked (1339); Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/02/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the penumbra coil 400 (pc400) pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was kinked in multiple locations and fractured approximately 83.0 cm from the proximal end, with the pull wire withdrawn out of the distal segment.The embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the pusher assembly was kinked in multiple locations and fractured, and that the embolization coil was detached.Since the pc400 was reportedly removed from the procedure with no mention of fracture or detachment, the fracture was likely incidental.The observed fracture and some of the observed kinks may have occurred during packaging for return.If the pusher assembly becomes fractured, it may allow the pull wire to retract out of the distal detachment tip (ddt), which would allow the embolization coil to detach.Since the pc400 could not be functionally tested for advancement through a microcatheter due to the fracture and detached embolization coil, the root cause of the issues experienced during the procedure could not be determined.Due to the multiple kinks located throughout the pusher assembly, the kink that occurred while pushing and pulling the pc400 could not be identified.The pc400 introducer sheath and the px slim mentioned in the complaint were not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils and catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2017-02130.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the internal iliac artery (iia) using penumbra coil 400's (pc400's) and a px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim).During the procedure, the physician placed the px slim into the distal end of the right iia (superior gluteal artery and bifurcation of inferior gluteal artery), then deployed and detached six pc400's into the target vessel.While attempting to advance a new pc400 through the px slim, the physician experienced resistance when the coil was advanced midway through the px slim.Subsequently, the pc400 pusher assembly became kinked when the physician used a little force in an attempt to advance the coil further.Therefore, the physician removed both the px slim and the pc400 from the patient¿s body.The procedure was then completed using a new px slim and three additional pc400''s.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA COIL 400
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7089265
MDR Text Key95072147
Report Number3005168196-2017-02129
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548010601
UDI-Public00814548010601
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/06/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/01/2024
Device Catalogue Number4002C1040
Device Lot NumberF68188
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/16/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/06/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/06/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/03/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age81 YR
-
-