• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Device Problems Kinked (1339); Device Damaged Prior to Use (2284); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 11/06/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the third ruby coil evaluated.The pusher assembly was kinked approximately 5.0 cm from the proximal end.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly.The introducer sheath had coagulated blood inside.Conclusions: evaluation of the first returned device revealed that the ruby coil¿s pusher assembly was kinked in multiple locations.This damage was likely accidental during advancement of the ruby coil into the lantern on the back table as mentioned in the complaint.The kinks in the pusher assembly prevented the returned ruby coil from being functionally tested through a demonstration microcatheter.Evaluation of the returned device revealed that the podj¿s pet lock was broken and the pull wire was retracted out of the ddt.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If pet lock is broken and the pull wire is retracted out of the ddt during manipulation of the device, by design, the embolization coil will detach from its pusher assembly.The pull wire being retracted out of the ddt likely caused the embolization coil to detach from its pusher assembly.Evaluation of the second returned device revealed that the ruby coil was functional.The ruby coil was advanced through a demonstration microcatheter and out of the distal tip without an issue.Evaluation of the third returned device revealed that the ruby coil¿s pusher assembly was kinked and the introducer sheath had coagulated blood inside.The kink in the pusher assembly was likely accidental during advancement of the ruby coil into the lantern as mentioned in the complaint.The coagulated blood prevented the ruby coil from being advanced through the demonstration microcatheter during functional testing.Evaluation of the returned lantern revealed that the microcatheter distal shaft was repeatedly kinked.This type of damage likely occurred due to forceful manipulation during placement of the ruby coils.These kinks likely contributed to the ruby coil unintentionally detaching within the microcatheter.A mandrel could not be completely advanced through the returned lantern during functional testing.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.Penumbra catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The product lot number was not provided, therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2017-02119, 3005168196-2017-02120.3005168196-2017-02121.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using pod packing coils (podjs) and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).During preparation for the procedure, the hospital technician accidentally kinked two ruby coils while advancing them into the lantern on the back table.A third ruby coil also became kinked during preparation on the back table.The damage to these ruby coils occurred prior to use, and therefore they were not used in the procedure.During the procedure, the physician successfully placed ruby coils using the same lantern.The physician then experienced difficulty placing a podj within the target location and, consequently, the podj unintentionally detached as the physician was manipulating it.The physician therefore removed the lantern with the podj inside, and the procedure was completed using a new lantern and additional ruby coils.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section was incorrectly reported on the initial mfr report and is being corrected on this follow-up #01 mfr report:3005168196-2017-02122.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2017-02119, 3005168196-2017-02120, 3005168196-2017-02121.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key7089416
MDR Text Key95074656
Report Number3005168196-2017-02122
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,11/06/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/16/2017
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/06/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/06/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/14/2005
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/03/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age83 YR
Patient Weight57
-
-