• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: JOHNSON AND JOHNSON VISION - USA UNK-SOFT CONTACT LENSES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

JOHNSON AND JOHNSON VISION - USA UNK-SOFT CONTACT LENSES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK-SOFT CONTACT LENSES
Device Problem No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
Patient Problems Corneal Abrasion (1789); Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Eval: no testing methods performed; no results available since no evaluation performed; unable to confirm complaint; device not returned.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2017 a patient (pt) called to report while wearing acuvue brand contact lenses (specific lens was unknown) under a rigid gas permeable lens for the past thirty years or so to treat keratoconus, he/she has had numerous issues.During the past thirty years, the pt reported he/she has worn different acuvue lenses.This report is for the pts corneal abrasions and "eye infections" event.Pt reported he/she did not think the events were related to the contact lenses, but due to the keratoconus.The pt reported in the past he/she was prescribed vigamox drops, polymyxin b and prednisone for the issues he/she experienced.Pt could not recall when or where he/she was treated for the event as he/she was treated at different eye care providers (ecp) in different states.On (b)(6) 2017 a call was placed to the pts treating ecps office and a representative reported additional information as follows: the representative reported the pts chart shows the pt is now being treated by a specialist for keratoconus.The pts history indicated corneal abrasions with scars, no dates were provided.Also noted the pt ¿has an extremely thin cornea".On visit date (b)(6) 2011, the pt stated he/she was seen by another ecp and advised the pt had a centrally located corneal abrasion with scarring od.The pt at that time was wearing a ¿hybrid lens¿ and it was not noted the pt was wearing an acuvue brand contact lens at that time.The pt the pt was transferred to a corneal specialist, the keratoconus is stable and to continue piggyback lenses; the representative reported that the pts underlying condition is the cause of the issues.No additional medical information was obtained and no additional medical information is expected.This event is being reported as a worst case right eye event as the diagnosis was unable to be verified by the pts treating ecp.The event date is unknown.The acuvue brand was unknown.The lot number and the suspect lens were not available.If additional information is received, it will be reported within 30 days of receipt.Serious reportable event trends are reviewed quarterly in franchise management review meetings.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK-SOFT CONTACT LENSES
Type of Device
UNK-SOFT CONTACT LENSES
Manufacturer (Section D)
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON VISION - USA
7500 centurion parkway
jacksonville FL
Manufacturer Contact
rose harrell
7500 centurion parkway
jacksonville, FL 32256
9044433364
MDR Report Key7097789
MDR Text Key94196408
Report Number1057985-2017-00141
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/15/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-SOFT CONTACT LENSES
Device Lot NumberUNK-UNK-SOFT CONTACT LENSES
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/15/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/07/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-