• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION SHUNT SENSOR SYS500; BLOOD GAS MONITOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION SHUNT SENSOR SYS500; BLOOD GAS MONITOR Back to Search Results
Model Number CDI510H
Device Problem Leak/Splash (1354)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 11/20/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Terumo has not received the device for evaluation; therefore, the investigation has yet to be completed.Terumo plans on submitting a follow-up report when the investigation is complete and when more information becomes available.For this reason, terumo references (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The user facility reported to terumo cardiovascular that prior to cardiopulmonary bypass, during prime, there was a leak from the shunt sensor.No patient involvement as this occurred during prime.Product was changed out.Procedure was completed successfully.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is submitted to fda in accord with applicable regulations ¿ and as indicated by terumo cardiovascular systems in the initial report submitted to the fda on december 8, 2017.All available information has been placed on file in quality management for appropriate tracking, trending, and follow-up.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is submitted to fda in accord with applicable regulations.The returned sample was visually inspected.Some delamination noted on the chemistries caused by lack of buffer but no other defects were noted such as cracks or damages anywhere else on the device.No buffer and no caps were present upon receipt and the original packaging was not returned for evaluation.A known good cap was obtained and carefully attached to the large blue cap of the returned unit.The returned unit was pressurized with air to approximately 1043mmhg and submerged into the water bath for 30 seconds, no leaks were observed.The unit was removed from the water bath and an attempt was made to tighten the large blue luer cap, it was found to be fully tight and seated properly.It was pressurized again and placed into the water bath for 30 seconds, no leaks were observed.A retention sample from the same product code/lot number combination was visually inspected and confirmed to not have any buffer solution on the outside of the unit or within the pouch.It is possible that during the setup of the circuit, the connections made with the shunt sensor were not completely tightened or closed, causing them to leak.All available information has been placed on file in quality management for appropriate tracking, trending, and follow-up.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SHUNT SENSOR SYS500
Type of Device
BLOOD GAS MONITOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION
125 blue ball road
elkton MD 21921
Manufacturer Contact
cathleen hargreaves
125 blue ball road
elkton, MD 21921
8002837866
MDR Report Key7101079
MDR Text Key95080290
Report Number1124841-2017-00248
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K972962
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/26/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2018
Device Model NumberCDI510H
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberVG19A
Other Device ID Number(01)00699753160767
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/11/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/21/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/08/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/11/2017
01/16/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/03/2018
01/26/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/06/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-